I know some people in here have had success in getting SunRay Server
Software to run in quite recent Hipster versions.
I can't remember who among you it was, so please stand up and be counted!
Has anybody done a write-up on the OI wiki of what must be done to make
SRSS run on Hipster?
Is it simpl
On 11/ 9/16 11:24 AM, Hans J Albertsson wrote:
I know some people in here have had success in getting SunRay Server
Software to run in quite recent Hipster versions.
I can't remember who among you it was, so please stand up and be counted!
Has anybody done a write-up on the OI wiki of what must
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: "Hans Rosenfeld"
> Subject: [developer] HEADS UP: new driver for Intel WifiLink
> 4965/100/1000/2000/5000/6000
> Date: November 9, 2016 at 1:40:30 PM GMT+1
> To: disc...@grumpf.hope-2000.org, develo...@lists.illumos.org
> Reply-To: develo...@lists.illumos.o
On 11/8/16, 5:18 PM, "Harry Putnam" wrote:
"Hetrick, Joseph P" writes:
> Hi,
>
> I would be very aware of the issues with zfs send/recv I have posted
> here and to illumos discuss before performing either activity. If you
> have an OI 151aN series install I would be cautious thinking you c
Hi again,
so, next round against zones :)
Inside my local zone (named zone1) I have:
root@zone1:/root# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
nas650G 13.4T96K /nas
nas/zones 537M 13.4T88K /n
On 09.11.2016 15:59, Maurilio Longo via openindiana-discuss wrote:
I did try to create the export filesystem as child of nas/zones/zone1
but I can't, I get a permission denied error.
Now, just to be sure, am I the only one who tries/wants to proceed like
this?
Hi Maurilio
So far what I have
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016, Maurilio Longo via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Which is similar to a global zone's hierarchy and gives me a local user which
is not root.
I did try to create the export filesystem as child of nas/zones/zone1 but I
can't, I get a permission denied error.
Now, just to be s
Hi Till,
in my case they don't seem to be holding any configuration file and dev is
empty, but the fact that zone1 is still under GZ's control makes sense.
root@st-ar-02:/root# ls -la /nas/zones/zone1/
total 10
drwx-- 4 root root 4 Nov 9 12:30 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 3 Nov 9 12:08 ..
Hi Bob,
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Normally one tries really hard to avoid putting any actual data in the
zone since this becomes dead weight (or baggage) whenever the zone is
cloned and going back to an earlier snapshot reverts both the zone root
and the data. Instead you have the zone do a lo