Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Oios ????? Re: mailinglist oios

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Jim Klimov wrote: > 11 февраля 2017 г. 22:36:09 CET, bscuk2 пишет: > >openindiana was a project name in the past but it evolved to oi and > >oios > >as branding and search engine necessities moved it on. Clearly I am not > > >

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Oios ????? Re: mailinglist oios

11 февраля 2017 г. 22:36:09 CET, bscuk2 пишет: >openindiana was a project name in the past but it evolved to oi and >oios >as branding and search engine necessities moved it on. Clearly I am not > >now keen on calling it Hipster now as people suggest. Keep it as it is >oi or

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Oios ????? Re: mailinglist oios

openindiana was a project name in the past but it evolved to oi and oios as branding and search engine necessities moved it on. Clearly I am not now keen on calling it Hipster now as people suggest. Keep it as it is oi or oios. On 11/02/2017 21:32, Nikola M wrote: On 01/30/17 01:36 AM,

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Oios ????? Re: mailinglist oios

On 01/30/17 01:36 AM, Jerry Kemp wrote: Came across this post searching my personal archives for something else. I got under impression it's just a nickname he likes to call Openindiana. Didn't spread much as branding is Openindiana / OI. ___

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] libarchive - Solaris ACL support

On 02/10/17 04:06 PM, Gordon Ross wrote: I also wanted to ask: How widely used is the archive format for these ACLs? i.e. are there tools on Windows to create or unpack this archive format? (including the ACL data) Doesn't MS Windows (10, Pro) supports now running Linux (Ubuntu) binaries,

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Qt 5.8 recipe pushed, slowly approaching

Hi, after some building, patching and rebuilding, etc.. we are close to having a first build of Qt 5.8 available. The pull request is located here: https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/pull/2748 Thanks go to Julien who upstreamed a few patches already. If you have time for testing the

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Any 32-bit users?

On 02/11/17 05:29 PM, Peter Tribble wrote: Something that came up in discussion while we were at FOSDEM was whether it's safe to ship 64-bit only applications in OpenIndiana. Which begs the obvious question - is anyone running OpenIndiana on hardware that isn't 64-bit? Please reply if so. I

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Any 32-bit users?

Peter, 1. Yes. Many end users still own old 32-bit Pentium 4-based desktops and laptops. 2. Yes, OI could ship 64-bit only applications/drivers/etc. OI has recent binary core snapshots and FOSS packages supporting 32-bit platforms. Having a 64-bit only core distro snapshot and packages is just

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Any 32-bit users?

I would agree with that. Sent with Mailtrack " 'With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Any 32-bit users?

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Peter Tribble wrote: > Something that came up in discussion while we were at FOSDEM was > whether it's safe to ship 64-bit only applications in OpenIndiana. > Maybe we could identify a subset of applications, libraries for which it makes

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Any 32-bit users?

I would like the possibility of running a modern operating system on a 32-bit Xeon processor-based system (specifically a NetBurst generation Xeon), such as a ProLiant DL360 G3. I'm already limited to an older version of RHEL and an older version of Windows Server as well...

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Any 32-bit users?

Something that came up in discussion while we were at FOSDEM was whether it's safe to ship 64-bit only applications in OpenIndiana. Which begs the obvious question - is anyone running OpenIndiana on hardware that isn't 64-bit? Please reply if so. To check, use the isainfo command. If "isainfo