Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Pending Desktop features for 2017.04 need volunteers

2017-02-12 Thread Aurélien Larcher
Hi Tim, sorry for the late reply. > When I do my next package contribution, I'm going to try keep better > notes, so I can also submit some feedback or updates for the documentation > itself. For example, I found that there were some inconsistencies between > >

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Any 32-bit users?

2017-02-12 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
On 11.02.2017 19:29, Peter Tribble wrote: Something that came up in discussion while we were at FOSDEM was whether it's safe to ship 64-bit only applications in OpenIndiana. Which begs the obvious question - is anyone running OpenIndiana on hardware that isn't 64-bit? Please reply if so. To

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Any 32-bit users?

2017-02-12 Thread Peter Tribble
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Nikola M wrote: > On 02/11/17 05:29 PM, Peter Tribble wrote: > >> Something that came up in discussion while we were at FOSDEM was >> whether it's safe to ship 64-bit only applications in OpenIndiana. >> >> Which begs the obvious question - is

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Any 32-bit users?

2017-02-12 Thread Peter Tribble
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Aurélien Larcher < aurelien.larc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Peter Tribble > wrote: > > > Something that came up in discussion while we were at FOSDEM was > > whether it's safe to ship 64-bit only applications

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Any 32-bit users?

2017-02-12 Thread Peter Tribble
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 5:06 PM, ken mays via openindiana-discuss < openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org> wrote: > Peter, > 1. Yes. Many end users still own old 32-bit Pentium 4-based desktops and > laptops. > While true, that wasn't the question. The question is whether people are actively using