On 5/4/2021 8:59 AM, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> Le 5/4/21 à 1:43 PM, Stephan Althaus a écrit :
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> We have "Boot environments"
>>
>> On every "pkg update" you get a new BE that will be used on next reboot.
>
> This is just
>
...
> Is this done by issuing a ZFS snapshot of the
On 09/26/17 12:59 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
How to tell which BEs are ok to delete. What is common practice
regarding deletion of BEs?
(I do know what the `N' and `R' mean and so not to delete them)
In my current list of BE's (shown at end of post)
I see one marked as backup-1... this is not
created:
p1/vb
p1/vb/vm
No snapshots are created at /vb/.zfs/snapshot
That directory exists, but does not get snapshots.
But, the usual stuff appears at /vb/vm/.zfs/snapshot
frequent, hourly, daily, weekly etc updates appear there.
Dave Miner <dave.mi...@oracle.com> writes:
Sound
Sounds like an old bug that was fixed some time ago in Solaris, where
the exclusion check for recursive snapshots isn't correct.
Dave
On 08/25/17 08:00 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
[Note: this message was inadvertently posted to
gmane.os.illumos.general but was intended for
On 01/19/17 09:04 AM, Dmitry Kozhinov wrote:
The most interesting thing in
http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/servers/sparc/oracle-sparc/sparc-roadmap-slide-2076743.pdf
for me is "Software in Silicon". I may be wrong, but I'm under
impression that Oracle integrates parts of
On 07/22/14 10:36, Ron Dawson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
Things work much better if you use the GUI installer to install systems on
which you want to run a GUI. On Solaris 11, pkg install solaris-desktop
would get you all
On 01/29/13 06:56, Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2013-01-28 19:54, Reginald Beardsley wrote:
My understanding is that it is not possible to boot from an EFI labeled disk.
Has that changed? In a way it's moot as I just got the UPS tracking info for
3x2 TB disks. But the info might help someone else.
On 01/26/13 09:44, Jan Owoc wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Reginald Beardsleypulask...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm trying to install on a 3 TB HGST disk which reports 512 byte sectors using
the text installer. The system is an HP N40L and is intended to be a ZFS based
NFS server for a
that Dave
Miner at Oracle would know for sure if anyone does.
No, we never got around to building one; I seem to recall we'd started a
prototype back in the late '90's but it never got to be a priority.
Dave
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana
beadm is missing a qualifier on mount to specify the pool name under
which the named BE is located, so it mounts the first BE it finds with
the name you specify. Since you had the same BE name present in your
existing root pool, that gets in the way. Your workaround removed the
conflict and
I've owned the Keyspan for several years, using it for tip access to my
old Netra X1. Has worked perfectly up through Solaris 11.
Dave
On 12/26/11 21:43, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
http://www.amazon.com/Keyspan-USA-19HS-Hi-Speed-supports-Sequence/dp/BVYJRY
(Keyspan by Tripp-Lite
On 12/20/11 06:51, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
Hi,
anyone knows a way to let distro_const cache the downloaded packages from IPS,
avoiding
download on every run???
The version of DC from back around 161 didn't allow this to be
controlled. If you're just re-running with the same package set but
reasons on IllumOS.
Is OI built with it?
--
Da: Dave Miner
A:
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Data: 2 giugno 2011 19.49.11 CEST
Oggetto: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Building an Installer On 06/ 2/11 07:18
AM, Gabriele
On 06/ 2/11 07:18 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
Hi, don't know if this is a silly question, but I'd like to know if there is
any chance
to have an installer tool for bulding a customized installer of openindiana
that would
contain what I need by default, including additional software of mine.
On 05/24/11 08:54 AM, Gary Mills wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:26:33AM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 09:21 +0100, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Hi All,
I too don't appreciate the flamewar on here of Solaris vs Linux,
sudo vs pfexec.
With all due respect, I think the
On 03/ 4/11 04:50 AM, Olaf Bohlen wrote:
Hi,
I want to install OSOL 134 in a LDOM on my T2000 to upgrade to OI 148.
So I got the AI sparc iso from genunix.org and set up my LDOM as following:
-- snip --
(448) foo:/root# ldm list -l osol
NAME STATE FLAGS CONSVCPU MEMORY
On 01/18/11 05:01 PM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
On 18 Jan 2011, at 18:31, Gordon Ross wrote:
Dave Miner writes: [...]
Perhaps refactoring of Caiman is needed, where the Live CD
ships with a pkg repo, starts a pkg server, and does an install
from that. Not sure how feasible this would be. Given
On 01/17/11 05:44 AM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Hi Gabriel,
On 01/17/11 10:07 AM, Gabriel de la Cruz wrote:
Thanks!
A place to start is a place to start, and an stable server release is
the most urgent one among all the other options.
Great - thanks for the feedback!
Some people is talking
On 12/28/10 02:39 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 12/28/10 16:47, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
patchadd is already obsolete, and was removed from the OpenSolaris
distro long
ago,
thanks for notifying me patchadd is no longer in use.
i was under the impression it in some capacity was still in use,
19 matches
Mail list logo
