Hi,
these combo seems to work very well, but openindiana or zfs itself has
some troubles with expanders and sata drives. If you use sas drives,
there will be no problem.
sata may work, but many people had troubles with sata and expanders.
You can look here: http://hardforum.com/showthread.ph
ve
backup, with all properties.
This command won't work:
*chmod A+user:marks:add_subdirectory:fd:allow /tank*
This command is listed in the oracle howto to delegate zfs permissions
to other users.
Best regards,
Florian
___
OpenIndiana-discu
d the meta file, too?
Is there an other method to import the LU or do I need to create new LU
with the received block devices?
Best regards
Florian
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/lis
g is implicit when -R is specified. The
receiving system must also support this feature./
Best regards
Florian
Am 02.09.2012 14:54, schrieb Mike La Spina:
I suspect you need to include the zfs properties with your zfs send, -p
will provide them.
Regards,
Mike
http://blog.laspina.ca
pshot
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
...
tank/raid1-2@replication_09-09-12-19:40:00 0 - 16K -
tank/raid1-2@nc_test05 0 - 16K -/
Best regards
Florian
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/m
at if someone can help me!
Regards
Florian
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
through
one Gbit Interface to a switch and this switch is connected to the two
OI servers. Will there be a bottleneck? Can I get full Gbit speed or is
this speed divided due to the mirroring of the iSCSI volumes?
Regards
Florian
___
OpenIndiana-discuss
Am 15.11.2012 13:15, schrieb Jorge Palma:
raid1 at the OS level, but SPOF on network level.
This is no Problem, I change a switch in 5 minutes, but the Server takes
much longer.
This was not my question! Thanks for the not helping help!!!
El 15/11/2012 08:38, "Florian"
Hi,
I don't know where is your problem? You don't know our network
infrastructure.
It is not so easy to have two redundant switches, no it is even not
possible.
It would be nice, if we can have two redundant switches, but this was
not my question!
Sorry, if my first answer was rude to you,
your experience!
Am 16.11.2012 12:20, schrieb Christopher Chan:
On Friday, November 16, 2012 07:05 PM, Florian wrote:
Hi,
I don't know where is your problem? You don't know our network
infrastructure.
It is not so easy to have two redundant switches, no it is even not
possible.
I
1st legacy installations of other OSs and 2nd for testing newer
kernel/ON builds. regards, Florian
2010/9/24, Jeppe Toustrup :
> 2010/9/24 :
>> I have heard they is currently no XEN (xVM Server) and Crossbow inside.
>
> Crossbow is definitely included, I don't know about Xen
working hourlys of
data/Admin aren't made then). When setting backup back to false the rest
works fine again.
Any idea out there?
Thx,
Florian
Here a short extract from the service log:
--- snip ---
Failed to create snapshots for schedule: hourly
Caught RuntimeError exception in sna
12 matches
Mail list logo
