Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Split-root installations

2013-11-26 Thread Irek Szczesniak
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Jim Klimov wrote: > On 2013-11-26 17:25, Jim Klimov wrote: >> >> On 2013-11-17 03:50, Jim Klimov wrote: >>> >>>For years I've mentioned "split-root" installations of Solaris-like >>> systems in such a way that the root filesystem (the BE) is represented >>> by

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Split-root installations

2013-11-26 Thread Irek Szczesniak
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Jim Klimov wrote: > On 2013-11-17 03:50, Jim Klimov wrote: >> >>For years I've mentioned "split-root" installations of Solaris-like >> systems in such a way that the root filesystem (the BE) is represented >> by several datasets, such as a split-off /usr datase

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Install OpenIndiana in an UFS root

2013-09-09 Thread Irek Szczesniak
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Richard Elling wrote: > On Sep 9, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Simon Toedt wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Peter Tribble >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> topic says it all. I want to install OpenIndiana on a UFS filesystem. No typo. I do not want to use ZFS on my

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Sudden ZFS performance issue

2013-07-05 Thread Irek Szczesniak
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Saso Kiselkov wrote: > On 05/07/2013 17:08, w...@vandenberge.us wrote: >> Good morning, >> >> I have a weird problem with two of the 15+ OpenSolaris storage servers in our >> environment. All the Nearline servers are essentially the same. Supermicro >> X9DR3-F based

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Gnome and the future

2012-11-05 Thread Irek Szczesniak
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote: > >> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/distributor-list/2012-November/msg2.html >> >> The GNOME community today announced the EOL of their "fallback" mode, > > These people have created a desktop for Linux and they do not care about > a

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [developer] Gnome and the future

2012-11-04 Thread Irek Szczesniak
solution to appear. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 4, 2012, at 12:01 PM, Irek Szczesniak wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Alex Caudill wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 9:46 AM, James Carlson >>> wrote: >>>> On 11/04/12 09:06, Irek Sz

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [developer] Gnome and the future

2012-11-04 Thread Irek Szczesniak
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Alex Caudill wrote: > On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 9:46 AM, James Carlson > wrote: >> On 11/04/12 09:06, Irek Szczesniak wrote: >>> This is useless because you still do not have newlocale(), duplocale() >>> or uselocale() which cre

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [developer] Gnome and the future

2012-11-04 Thread Irek Szczesniak
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Alex Caudill wrote: > On 11/1/12, Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> If this is holding up someone else who wants to do real work of porting >> dependency software (Gnome 3, etc.) contact me off list and I'll see if I >> can either allocate some weekend/evening time to do t

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Gnome and the future

2012-11-01 Thread Irek Szczesniak
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Jonathan Adams wrote: > from what I remember of the conversations of the time, we cannot move > to Gnome 3 because of certain Linux dependencies ... > > Gnome 2 is no longer changing, and no longer being patched ... The problem with Gnome 3 is AFAIK mostly a probl

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris cp problems

2012-09-24 Thread Irek Szczesniak
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Sebastian Gabler wrote: > Hi, > > I am facing problems with the solaris cp command: > > $ usr/bin/cp -pr . is raising the following errors: > > "cp: cannot create ./ too many open files" > "cp: cannot open too many open files" > "cp: Failed to preserve extended

[OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS hidden files

2012-06-06 Thread Irek Szczesniak
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: > Hi, > > On NFS mounted file systems I often happen to find daemons of the client > complaining about the hidden .nfsxxx files appearing and disappearing. > These are often annoying. > > Is there any way to let the server completely hide the