Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Installing on Intel B460M chipset intel i5-10400F

unsubscribe On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:12 PM Carl Brewer wrote: > Further to this, it works with a pair of Samsung SSD 980 NVMe M.2 drives > as a ZFS mirror for root, I used the text installed. Simple. > > Thank you Aurelian! > > Carl > > > ___ >

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] The kiss of death

Got this scrambled graphics screen. Going to try text install. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 22, 2021, at 11:54 AM, Judah Richardson > wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:20 AM Richard L. Hamilton > wrote: > >> I don't reinstall from an image, but run pkg update almost daily, and have >>

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] The kiss of death

I'm highly motivated to help test for sparc ( sb100, sb2000, ultra5,2,1) and I do have one shitty pc (HP Z400) I can add to the fray. Please let me know how I can be useful. On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 7:30 PM Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss < openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org> wrote:

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How is this possible?

Oh but you switched video card into the offending chassis and got same bad behaviour!! Shoot sorry, missed that. Same EFI / BIOS level on both motherboards? On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 2:49 PM Jacob Ritorto wrote: > Off the cuff guess: differing video card firmware. My kid's crappy linux >

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How is this possible?

Off the cuff guess: differing video card firmware. My kid's crappy linux PC had lingering (despite full blow-away-the-whole-disk reinstall) weird settings that harassed us for months until I found a more severe reset (different OS), which I presume included fw, but things are so candy-coated

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OI foer Sparc?

+1! I have near zero interest unless it's running on SPARC or ARM. PC platform needs be allowed to die, not be encouraged by talented unix people who have smarter stuff to do with their time. On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:39 AM rmd wrote: > > Hi, > just read the following post. Is there a OI

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana on ARM - WAS:: the end is near? ::Fwd: Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs on 32 bit?

It's been a few years since I was hopeful about this, but if someone revives this development, I'd exuberantly report results on my raspberry pi. On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Jerry Kemp wrote: > Thanks Bob, > > I know ARM is a popular platform, I keep holding back

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] masquerade

Check out NAT (network address translation) On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:11 PM, wrote: > > This should be a simple and short thread. > > How do I configure packet filter on my computer, with two network > interfaces, to masquerade from my private LAN to the outside world, so

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] masquerade

Check out NAT (network address translation) On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:11 PM, wrote: > > This should be a simple and short thread. > > How do I configure packet filter on my computer, with two network > interfaces, to masquerade from my private LAN to the outside world, so

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ARM port

I really wanted to try it too, but rmustacci told me a week or so ago that it's not even to the point of having the memory mapper done yet. I'd like to pitch in if anyone else is motivated to work on it, but would need to pair up to get immersed and rolling. --jake On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:31

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] SSD as a dedicated swap device

I've used swap plain partitions on zfs-rooted machines as well as multi-disk zfs swap, both to good effect. Even if secondary storage (SSD) can never be as fast as primary (RAM), it'll should allow the job to proceed when the batch process peaks its memory utilisation. Since it's batch

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Σχετ: ANNOUNCE: OpenSXCE-org/FireFox-43-port-for-all-OpenSolaris-distros with gcc4 flash-plugin support released at bin PKG and the src on GitHub

nice, thank you! Is there a need to do SPARC packages, too? I have a reasonably-updated T2000 here running OpenSXCE I could use to prepare them with a little hand-holding.. On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: > Hello. > > I've created test component for FF

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Martin Bochnig

I, too, am all for including Martin. And I also strongly support the open source mandate since the lack of this is what ruined the computer world via Microsoft, Oracle etc. in the eighties and before. I'm happy to help in the negotiations, vetting, etc. if you have a need for me. --jake On

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] All 32-bit-only X device drivers removed from Hipster -??

What Nikola said. +1. On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Nikola M minik...@gmail.com wrote: I have been reading 'Hipster' change log, posted on Openindiana wiki under the page: http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/oi_hipster and I noticed that alp did All 32-bit-only X device drivers removed.,

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 32-bit support in OpenIndiana Hipster

I was meaning to compose something to this effect, but Peter, you've put it perfectly. Despite personally having moved off of 32-bit in the nineties, I agree with Peter and would rather see 32-bit remain for now. Might come in handy for the ARM port, too ;) --jake On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Does OpenBSD support ZFS?

Nice. Just grabbed it and tried, but this poor thing doesn't have enough RAM. Now this is getting to be a personal challenge more than a pragmatic solution. I feel like I'm so close. Anyone know of a way to make the installation boot to something other than ramdisk? Like, maybe I could

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Does OpenBSD support ZFS?

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Peter Tribble peter.trib...@gmail.com wrote: 3. Set up a network boot server and boot off NFS. I know this works on x86, I haven't yet tried regular network boot or NFS root on a sparc box. For minimal memory, you'll need genuine NFS root, the vanilla network

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oi or hipster for ultra5?

SPARC 2 to SPARC 10 to Ultra 1 2 5 to T10002000 around if I can help out with further Tribblix testing or maybe a little dev. --jake On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Peter Tribble peter.trib...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oi or hipster for ultra5?

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Peter Tribble peter.trib...@gmail.com wrote: If you want to get really minimalist then you could use ufs rather than zfs. This also saves the space needed for the drivers and tools, which isn't negligible. Tribblix again is one of the only distros to support

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oi or hipster for ultra5?

;) On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:59 PM, David Brodbeck bro...@uw.edu wrote: On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.com wrote: Going to recompile the bins on bsd. Absolutely LOVING the keyboard. Gosh, I missed that thing. Otherwise, yeah, don't need a pc here

[OpenIndiana-discuss] oi or hipster for ultra5?

Hi, My Solaris 11 install is getting a little long in the tooth and I still use this poor old machine kind of a lot for small development, pdp11 emulation and its real serial ports, etc. I would like to keep it because it's pretty low power, reliable as dirt, and still supports the very

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oi or hipster for ultra5?

, Feb 1, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Andrew Gabriel illu...@cucumber.demon.co.uk wrote: Jacob Ritorto wrote: On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Andrew Gabriel illu...@cucumber.demon.co.uk wrote: Do you have to stick with SPARC? Your Ultra 5 is going to be way slower than any current (and many old

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oi or hipster for ultra5?

Hmm, yeah, Tribblix sounds like a great option for my purposes. Is there X support? That'd be nice so I can free up the other serial port. (Trying to simultaneously run a serial console to the pdp11 as well as an emulated tu58 drive via the other serial port.) I think I'll give it a whirl.

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oi or hipster for ultra5?

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Andrew Gabriel illu...@cucumber.demon.co.uk wrote: Do you have to stick with SPARC? Your Ultra 5 is going to be way slower than any current (and many old) x86 systems, which are supported by all the Illumos distributions. I don't have to; it's just that I

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oi or hipster for ultra5?

Wow. I just put OpenBSD on this thing and it runs like a pup. I'm really impressed. Is anyone besides Peter working on cruft-cutting and minimal system distribution of Illumos? If things can be this awesome on 1998 hardware, we really should aspire to this level of KISS, tidiness and

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oi or hipster for ultra5?

Going to recompile the bins on bsd. Absolutely LOVING the keyboard. Gosh, I missed that thing. Otherwise, yeah, don't need a pc here. I admit that I'm a little nervy about the bsd learning curve, but, hey - it's a nice thing to pick up along the way. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Jerry

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] forum creation

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 5:09 PM, David Brodbeck bro...@uw.edu wrote: That said, the steady withering of this project since Oracle withdrew support makes it all kind of moot; a dozen or so email messages a week isn't much of a burden. At this point I view it as a historic preservation

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] forum creation

+1 On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org wrote: I asked what was broken, so the text below misquotes me entirely. I do not think anything needs to be changed. I think the OI/Illumos lists work pretty well. We seem

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] forum creation

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote: What about the forums at http://www.opensolaris.org/;? Did these not contribute to archiving for posterity? haha. ouch, that zinger stung! ___ openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] LX Branded zones

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:30 PM, James Carlson carls...@workingcode.com wrote: Having lived through the effort at Sun, I don't think it's a great idea. The problem with the LX branded zones is that you need a huge team of people to chase every little feature in Linux. The bizarro world /proc

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OI installation on Intel NUC...

I fought this a couple years ago and eventually figured it out, but the sequence is slightly vague in my mind. It's something to do with the 1G header file mentioned on http://wiki.openindiana.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=25231661 being too small or too large for your usb stick. If you

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] A ZFS related question: How successful is ZFS, really???

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Hans J Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your views, the serial storage (tape mostly?) problem is news to me but otherwise I concur. While you can always zfs send the filesystem to a tape, it's not recommended to do this sort of thing

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] A ZFS related question: How successful is ZFS, really???

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Jonathan Adams t12nsloo...@gmail.com wrote: ZFS is the most advanced filesystem on the planet IMHO, we have been using it for 10+ years in production. +1 There is some fragmentation, Solaris 11 has an incompatible version of ZFS, at least for now. In the

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Should I see a major slowdown when rsyncing to zfs nfs share

oops, you're Writing to the share, not reading from it; pls disregard and sorry for the misread. On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.com wrote: is it mounted with noatime? Updating access time for every file being read over nfs sometimes results in massive

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Should I see a major slowdown when rsyncing to zfs nfs share

is it mounted with noatime? Updating access time for every file being read over nfs sometimes results in massive slowdown. An nfs rsync of millions of tiny files would exhibit this pathology. On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote: Server setup: oi build 151_a9

[OpenIndiana-discuss] beagleboard (arm) port?

Hi, I was thinking of building a minimal low performance/experimental zfs filer on a beagleboard ( http://beagleboard.org ) or something similar with a 2tb mirror disk set attached via usb and a serial console. Are there any projects or plans to compile/port OpenIndiana to arm? If

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] beagleboard (arm) port?

...@cloudpixies.com -Original Message- From: Jacob Ritorto [mailto:jacob.rito...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 February 2011 13:45 To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] beagleboard (arm) port? Hi, I was thinking of building a minimal low performance/experimental zfs

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] beagleboard (arm) port?

Good stuff fellows; thank you. How bad are the failures resulting from non-ecc and missing cache flushes? Can they put the pool into an unrecoverable state, or is it just a risk of dropping a minute's worth of writes or something like that? Again, this is a home archiving system with

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] equivalents for SUNWcryr/SUNWcry?

I got networker to run on opensolaris by linking the old library name that it was looking for to the existing library. Probably not blessed or supportable, but it did the trick. Used truss to figure out just which libs it was calling. Lack of support for osol was one of the two big reasons