, this time it took 33hr for each disk (ie 100hr to do all three
over 5 days).
I have tried to update the OS before and always it fails at some point,
so in the end just stayed with what worked.
On 2/12/15 10:36, david allan finch wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if anyone had any ideas of what to do
On 10/6/22 10:36, Marcel Telka wrote:
Maybe rebuild-index would work better than rebiuld-index. :-)
I did spot that before I ran it, but as my first language is not Modern
English but old-fashioned-westcounty-giberish I didn't think it should
complain.
On 10/6/22 09:20, Predrag Zečević wrote:
I would try:
:; pfexec pkg refresh --full
:; pfexec pkg rebiuld-index
thanks.
I just tried that, refresh gives the same error. I did this three times
(refresh gives the error) and then tried the update and it gives the
same error message.
This is
On 10/6/22 07:51, Predrag Zečević via openindiana-discuss wrote:
The reference into VB's git seems to suggest that it was done in
January?
https://github.com/omniosorg/omnios-extra/pull/921
I'm not seeing any issues with VB 6.1.38 on my OI servers, with a
build from a week ago, but I'm not
Hi,
Not quite sure what has broken it but, I installed the latest version of
VirtualBox 6.1.38 and updated the client extension into my OpenIndiana
VM client (it was the last build 2021Oct from the ISO). Around the same
time I did a pkg update to the latest changes. Since then the Shared
creating the bootable USB drive.
Is anyone else attually doing this from Windows?
On 07/07/21 12:08 PM, david allan finch wrote:
On 07/07/21 10:02 AM, Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss wrote:
there are several manuals, boot(1M), gptzzfsboot(5), loader(5).
thanks
in your case, the problem
Is this the same as I could not get the USB install drive to boot?
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: "Andreas Wacknitz"
To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" ,
"OpenIndiana Developer mailing list"
Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] warning - don't update OI
Date: Sat, Jul 24, 2021
On 07/07/21 10:02 AM, Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss wrote:
there are several manuals, boot(1M), gptzzfsboot(5), loader(5).
thanks
in your case, the problem starts from the fact that we do not get information
about partitions, on screenshot, all disks are listed without partitioning
Hi,
I have not installed openindiana on real hardware for sometime, done it
lots of times via a iso on virtualbox.
I copied the latest usb image with Win32DiskImager on to a usb thumbdrive.
When it boot I get:
list of c: ... and disk-x
illumos/x86 boot
Can't find disk-1:/boot/loader
I
Hi,
I have an old server running oi_151a9 which I can't just update to a
newer OpenIndiana yet (I have a plan to replace it with a newie machine
once I have a free one which will use the latest build).
I am having an issue with putty/fillzilla no longer working from windows
and the command
On 04/06/21 02:32 PM, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
A new release is due in about a month.
Wicked. Thanks
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
On 04/05/21 10:36 PM, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
Everybody should be aware that they are no official releases.
I will keep them there for some days.
Will there be a new release soon? I am thinking of building a new server.
Regards
___
On 01/20/21 12:50 PM, Michael Schuster wrote:
what you're describing is memory overcommit, which Solaris never did (at
least not while I was at Sun).
Good. BTW HP or IBM Unix was the first one I saw do this and they even
had special signals, to tell you. Sorry you app had to die as we lied
On 01/19/21 06:50 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
I have always noticed that Solaris (and OpenIndiana) is slower to fork
processes than Linux or FreeBSD. It seems slower to enlarge the
process address space as well (perhaps because it does not lie).
This is because Linux lies to an app about new
On 01/19/21 06:40 PM, Araragi Hokuto wrote:
2) What interface are you using, video console, terminal emulator
under X, or something else (through ssh, etc)?
I have found that some terminal emulators are quicker than others. I
normally switch to xterm when I find I have an issue with terminal
On 02/03/20 05:30 PM, Michal Nowak via openindiana-discuss wrote:
media/minidlna was packaged recently. Let us know how it works for you.
Thanks. I descovered that my server is still on oi_151a9 even though I
thought I had updated it. So that started a process of me trying to
update and
Hi,
Is there a package for a DNLA server?
What is the best one to build if there isn't one already done?
Thanks
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
On 08/19/19 05:50 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
...
Thanks for all that. I have a 160Gb disk so that should be good.
If I can find a second one in my stack of old disk I will look at trying
to set up the mirror.
Currently I am missing an ATX 8pin extra 12v connector for the
motherboard, so my
Hi All,
I am just about to build a new system:
What is the realistic small disk you can use to install on?
What is the recommened size assumimg all no OS stuff will be on another
pool? (ie to take into account updates etc)
Can you install a new system with a mirror as the boot drive? (I
Has anyone tried this motherboard with openindiana or have any ideas of
issues etc?
*Asus B250 Mining Expert Motherboard*
https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B075D7R8DL/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o02_s00?ie=UTF8=1
Thanks
___
openindiana-discuss
On 13/02/2015 08:42, Volker A. Brandt wrote:
I assume you have the 4 disks in some sort of RAID configuration. If
you want to sweat it, you can pull one drive out and have it
re-silver the replacement drive, repeat for the second drive, etc.
If you do this I would run a scrub before pulling each
Hi all,
I was wondering if anyone had any ideas of what to do for an upgrade?
I have a HP Proliant Microserver N54L with 4x 2Tb drives which I have been
happy with for more than a year but I have started to run out of disk space in
my zfs pool. I have been pruning the snapshots and rubbish
On 04/11/2014 03:36, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
While it would be nice if Solaris software was all 64-bit, in actual
practice I notice no difference in day to day use between systems with
32-bit applications and 64-bit. Only certain memory-hungry
applications will significantly benefit.
We
23 matches
Mail list logo
