On 3/21/2011 5:44 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
We do have support for running your own code using our API. Its just
that we can't reasonably be expected to support people who want do
things like... oh, zpool import -f (note the -f). Or editing
local configuration files that are also managed by
On 3/18/2011 6:32 PM, David Magda wrote:
Oracle has said that they will distribute updates to approved CDDL
or other open source- licensed code following full releases of our
enterprise Solaris operating system.
On 3/21/2011 2:59 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
I *hate* talking about unreleased product schedules
:).
but I think you can expect a beta with a month or two, perhaps less.
We've already got an alpha that we've handed out in limited
quantities.
Actually, I read about that alpha; one of my
Probably, we need place a tag before zfs -- Opensource-ZFS or Oracle-ZFS after
Solaris11 release.
If it is true, these two ZFSes will definitely evolve into different directions.
BTW, Did Oracle unveil the actual release date? We are also at the cross
road...
Thanks.
Fred
-Original
...@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [zfs-discuss] best migration path from
Solaris 10
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 06:26:37PM -0700, Michael DeMan wrote:
ZFSv28 is in HEAD now and will be out in 8.3.
ZFS + HAST in 9.x means being able to cluster off different hardware.
In regards
I think we all feel the same pain with Oracle's purchase of Sun.
FreeBSD that has commercial support for ZFS maybe?
Fbsd currently has a very old zpool version, not suitable for running with
SLOGs, since if you lose it, you may lose the pool, which isn't very amusing...
Vennlige hilsener /
