I've been trying to find what powerloss protected SSDs are available in
sweden.
The only ones I can find that are generally available are Samsung 843
and Intel S3500. The Intel S3500 costs about 1300 SEK (145 €??) each at
120GB.
The Seagates are NOT available anywhere that I can see.
Samsung
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Hans J. Albertsson <
hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se> wrote:
> Samsung 843
The 843 while called and enterprise SSD, does not have capacitors for power
loss protection.
http://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/samsung-843/2/
_
Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for this, for a bit
more $$ and a bit more speed. The 320 are not as fast as the S3700 or S3500
but they are a LOT less expensive.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Schweiss, Chip wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Hans J. Albertsson <
On 2014-02-10 22:50, Doug Hughes wrote:
Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for this, for a bit
more $$ and a bit more speed. The 320 are not as fast as the S3700 or S3500
but they are a LOT less expensive.
Also, read at least the official specs - the S3500 seems a lot less
rel
> Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for this, for a
> bit more $$ and a bit more speed. The 320 are not as fast as the
> S3700 or S3500 but they are a LOT less expensive.
This thread started out as a discussion of the merits of the HP N54L
microserver for home use. I am not real
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Volker A. Brandt wrote:
>
> This thread started out as a discussion of the merits of the HP N54L
> microserver for home use. I am not really sure if a home server needs
> mirrored battery-protected SSDs. :-)
>
I tend to agree with this. My approach is to slic
true, Volker..
Just to note though, the 320s have no battery, but they do have enough
capacitor to flush anything from the small ram into flash on power outage.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Volker A. Brandt wrote:
> > Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for this, for a
> >
Surprised someone hasn't developed a SATA power cable with small battery
Passthrough for this exact application.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Doug Hughes wrote:
> true, Volker..
>
> Just to note though, the 320s have no battery, but they do have enough
> capacitor to flush anything from the
capacitors are better. Batteries wear out and are difficult to have the
correct monitoring for replacement.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Ben Taylor wrote:
> Surprised someone hasn't developed a SATA power cable with small battery
> Passthrough for this exact application.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10
While I agree that monitoring is good, and batteries wear out, and this is
a problem in production environments. For a hobbyist, where I can take
down my system without permission from my boss or business unit, it is
really that bad of an idea?
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Doug Hughes wrote
Wouldn't a UPS with monitoring be a better alternative? Allow the server to
power down safely on UPS when it detects a power lost state. Most UPSes I
know have either serial or USB monitoring, sometimes even Ethernet on
higher-end models (although I've never looked at the monitoring systems in
dept
Is that really true:
The press reslease from Samsung in the US said explicitly:
"The integrated Power loss function includes tantalum capacitors, thus
ensuring the data is written while power failure. "
On 2014-02-10 22:32, Schweiss, Chip wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Hans J. Alber
The SSD I'm looking at is a Samsung 843T, note the "T".
Maybe there's a non - "T" variety w/o the powerloss protection??
On 2014-02-11 08:28, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
Is that really true:
The press reslease from Samsung in the US said explicitly:
"The integrated Power loss function includes
That was it. The 843 has no powerloss protection short-term backup power
supply, the 843T does have tantalum powerloss backup caps.
On 2014-02-11 08:42, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
The SSD I'm looking at is a Samsung 843T, note the "T".
Maybe there's a non - "T" variety w/o the powerloss protec
On 2014-02-11 01:08, Alex Smith (K4RNT) wrote:
Wouldn't a UPS with monitoring be a better alternative? Allow the server to
power down safely on UPS when it detects a power lost state. Most UPSes I
know have either serial or USB monitoring, sometimes even Ethernet on
higher-end models (although I'
15 matches
Mail list logo
