[OpenIndiana-discuss] Project status

2012-04-08 Thread Andrew Myers
This Wikipedia page seems to indicate that openindiana has been discontinued in favour of illumian. That's wrong, isn't it? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nexenta_OS&useformat=desktop ___ OpenIndian

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Project status

2012-04-08 Thread Alexander Eremin
Absolutely wrong, that's should be fixed. Thanks, Alexander On Apr 8, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Andrew Myers wrote: > This Wikipedia page seems to indicate that openindiana has been discontinued > in favour of illumian. > > That's wrong, isn't it? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nexenta

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Project status

2012-04-08 Thread Bayard Bell
Fixed. Clarified that illumian is derived from illumos and OpenIndiana community development and distinguished by continued use of Debian packaging. On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Alexander Eremin wrote: > Absolutely wrong, that's should be fixed. > Thanks, > Alexander > > On Apr 8, 2012, at 5:1

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Project status

2012-04-08 Thread Gregory Youngblood
I see this in the article: "In late 2011 Nexenta OS along with OpenIndiana was cancelled, the teams have now merged and are working on a replacement named Illumian" Sure looks like it says openindiana was canceled. Bayard Bell wrote: >Fixed. Clarified that illumian is derived from illumos an

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Project status

2012-04-08 Thread Alex Lam S.L.
Just checked, it has been updated to: "In late 2011 the Nexenta OS brand was terminated and replaced with Illumian, which is derived from community development for illumos and OpenIndiana but distinguished by continued use of Debian packaging." You might need to reload the page to see the updated

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Project status

2012-04-08 Thread Gregory Youngblood
It was 1st time that page was loaded on my phone so doubt it was local cache. Doesn't rule out other caches. I also didn't look at edit history, could there be a minor edit scuffle with changes getting reverted? Regardless, glad it is updated. "Alex Lam S.L." wrote: >Just checked, it has been

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Project status

2012-04-08 Thread Linda Kateley
Yes open indiana should have it's own page. They are different things. Is there someplace that shows the name of the editor? -- Linda Kateley Global Evangelist and Community Manager (mobile) 612-807-6349 (email) linda.kate...@nexenta.com (skype) lkateley On 4/8/12 8:16 AM, "Andrew Myers"

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Project status

2012-04-08 Thread Linda Kateley
So the oi one is right here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenIndiana -- Linda Kateley Global Evangelist and Community Manager (mobile) 612-807-6349 (email) linda.kate...@nexenta.com (skype) lkateley On 4/8/12 2:07 PM, "Linda Kateley" wrote: >Yes open indiana should have it's own page. Th

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Project status

2012-04-08 Thread Gary Driggs
Anyone that signs up for a Wikipedia account is welcome to edit any page on the site. But edit and version history by author are part of the design of mediawiki.. -Gary ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://open

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Project status

2012-04-08 Thread Bayard Bell
The edit in question came from an IP belonging to a Swedish VPN pool on February 17. OI has its own page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenIndiana On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Linda Kateley wrote: > Yes open indiana should have it's own page. They are different things. > > Is there someplace