Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question.

2014-04-14 Thread John McEntee
[mailto:mich...@edition-software.de] Sent: 11 April 2014 15:59 To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question. On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, John McEntee wrote: I have a zpool (3way mirror and striped across 21 disks), tank, that the zfs and zpool

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question.

2014-04-14 Thread John Ryan
On 13/04/2014 3:13 PM, Jim Klimov wrote: On 2014-04-13 01:33, John Ryan wrote: I had a problem once where I was unable to import a pool with a missing log disk. I was unable to recover the pool. Now I mirror the logs How long ago was that (or, rather, with how old a ZFS version)? There was

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question.

2014-04-13 Thread Jim Klimov
On 2014-04-13 01:33, John Ryan wrote: I had a problem once where I was unable to import a pool with a missing log disk. I was unable to recover the pool. Now I mirror the logs How long ago was that (or, rather, with how old a ZFS version)? There was this feature of requiring logs for import

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question.

2014-04-12 Thread John Ryan
On 11/04/2014 5:31 PM, John McEntee wrote: I know the logs are not a mirror, but I am going for performance over the risk of an ssd failure at the time of a reboot, at which I believe I can just throw again the ZIL and continue? According to

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question.

2014-04-11 Thread John McEntee
I have a zpool (3way mirror and striped across 21 disks), tank, that the zfs and zpool commands differ slightly. # zpool list tank NAME SIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT tank 19.0T 14.5T 4.51T76% 1.00x ONLINE - # zfs list tank NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question.

2014-04-11 Thread Michael Hase
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, John McEntee wrote: I have a zpool (3way mirror and striped across 21 disks), tank, that the zfs and zpool commands differ slightly. Are you sure it's a 3way mirror pool? Seems like you're running without any redundancy, look at devices c1t500A075103053202d0p2 and

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question.

2014-04-11 Thread John McEntee
-5461/ghbxs/ Thanks John -Original Message- From: Michael Hase [mailto:mich...@edition-software.de] Sent: 11 April 2014 15:59 To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question. On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, John McEntee wrote: I have

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question.

2014-04-11 Thread Michael Hase
- From: Michael Hase [mailto:mich...@edition-software.de] Sent: 11 April 2014 15:59 To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question. On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, John McEntee wrote: I have a zpool (3way mirror and striped across 21 disks), tank

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question.

2014-04-11 Thread Jim Klimov
11 апреля 2014 г. 16:20:32 CEST, John McEntee jmcen...@stirling-dynamics.com пишет: Due to pushing each disk fairly hard , if the zpool gets more than 80% full the way free space is allocated changes and we have a severe performance hit. This makes (generally one) VMWare host virtually unusable