Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade

2011-01-20 Thread Edward Martinez
On 01/20/11 05:27, Michelle Knight wrote: SSD and HD can not be mixed. Regards Edward Apologies, the three drives at the bottom of the list are the 2tb ones. There's no way I could afford a 2tb SSD on my local government salary!!!

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade

2011-01-20 Thread Michelle Knight
I've checked that the drives have new labels written, and all three know that there is 2tb on them. The interesting thing is the allocation... mich@jaguar:~# zpool list NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT data 4.06T 3.42T 655G84% 1.00x ONLINE - It knows the size

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade

2011-01-20 Thread Michelle Knight
Thanks Bernd, I know ... it isn't a backup solution. This is why I have the e-sata problems, to back up to external hard drives. - and I'm having problems with that as well :-) But the problem here is that the export and import should enable ZFS to make use of the extra space ... but for some

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade

2011-01-20 Thread Bernd Helber
Am 20.01.11 14:40, schrieb Michelle Knight: > Morning! > >> Personally i assume the peaks were triggerd by resilvering the pool. >> Its not uncommon that you have a high load, if your pool is resilvering. > > Yes, the peaks were triggered by the resiver. > > >> Best Practice in this case would

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade

2011-01-20 Thread Michelle Knight
Morning! > Personally i assume the peaks were triggerd by resilvering the pool. > Its not uncommon that you have a high load, if your pool is resilvering. Yes, the peaks were triggered by the resiver. > Best Practice in this case would have been creating a new Zpool, e.g > raidz.. > > zfs se

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade

2011-01-20 Thread Michelle Knight
> SSD and HD can not be mixed. > > Regards > Edward Apologies, the three drives at the bottom of the list are the 2tb ones. There's no way I could afford a 2tb SSD on my local government salary!!! ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list O

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade

2011-01-20 Thread Bernd Helber
Good Morning Michelle. Am 20.01.11 08:05, schrieb Michelle Knight: > hi Folks, > > OI 148. > > Three 1.5tb drives were replaced with three 2tb drives. They are here on > internal SATA channels c2t2d0, c2t3d0 and c2t4d0. One is a Seagate Barracuda > and the other two are Western Digital Greens

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade

2011-01-20 Thread Edward Martinez
On 01/19/11 23:05, Michelle Knight wrote: hi Folks, OI 148. Three 1.5tb drives were replaced with three 2tb drives. They are here on internal SATA channels c2t2d0, c2t3d0 and c2t4d0. One is a Seagate Barracuda and the other two are Western Digital Greens. mich@jaguar:~# cfgadm -lv Ap_Id

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade

2011-01-19 Thread Michelle Knight
Extra Info.. When i started the export/import, this is what came up in the messages ... Jan 20 06:30:47 jaguar unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ18 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Jan 20 06:30:47 jaguar This may result in reduced system performance. Jan 20 06:31:

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade

2011-01-19 Thread Michelle Knight
hi Folks, OI 148. Three 1.5tb drives were replaced with three 2tb drives. They are here on internal SATA channels c2t2d0, c2t3d0 and c2t4d0. One is a Seagate Barracuda and the other two are Western Digital Greens. mich@jaguar:~# cfgadm -lv Ap_Id Receptacle Occupant