Migrate to FF 31.6.0 ESR:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/31.6.0esr/contrib/solaris_pkgadd/
~K
On Monday, April 13, 2015 4:12 AM, Private openba...@gmail.com wrote:
I am currently using FF 31.5 ESR. I note the security warnings on
freakattack,CVE-2015-0291 and wonder if
On Friday, April 10, 2015 9:18 AM, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator]
predrag.zece...@2e-systems.com wrote:
On 04/10/15 03:10 PM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
The failures have varying forms:
A text file will sometimes be displayed instead of downloaded. Sometimes it
will be
Hi,
Does anyone know there is a Firefox 34.0.5 build available for
OpenIndiana as there are a number of security fixes and new features I
am interested in.
The Firefox Hello WebTC functionality to see if it will replace Skype.
TIA
Russell
___
Last available is 31.3.0esr
http://download.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/31.3.0esr/contrib/
Message du 23/12/14 15:48
De : russell
A : openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Copie à :
Objet : [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox 34.0.5 build for OpenIndiana
Hi
-Original Message-
Udo Grabowski (IMK)
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana solaris...@yahoogroups.com
Oct 15 at 2:46 AM
There's no problem with firefox or thunderbird_31.2.0 on oi_151a9
(this mail is written on TB 31.2.0 downloaded with FF 31.2.0...).
As usual, it seems to be a problem of
There's no problem with firefox or thunderbird_31.2.0 on oi_151a9
(this mail is written on TB 31.2.0 downloaded with FF 31.2.0...).
As usual, it seems to be a problem of the pkg version. Install
the tarball in /usr/local/ and point /usr/bin/{firefox,thunderbird}
to that binary. Never install
: [OpenIndiana-discuss] firefox 31.2.0esr broken?
From: Udo Grabowski (IMK) udo.grabow...@kit.edu
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:45:37 +0200
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org,
solaris...@yahoogroups.com solaris...@yahoogroups.com
There's no problem with firefox
I'm inclined to suspect that you have an LD_LIBRARY_PATH defined
somewhere which redirects firefox to use wrong library versions ?
On 15/10/2014 09:25, Marion Hakanson wrote:
Thanks for the feedback.
I do have an oi151a9 machine at home, 32-bit. And FF 31.2.0esr does seem
to work OK on there,
I'm inclined to suspect that you have an LD_LIBRARY_PATH defined
somewhere which redirects firefox to use wrong library versions ?
I'm inclined to suspect that firefox is totally broken since I am still using
OpenSolaris on
a machine and there the pluggin worked with no problem but now it
I also use the orginal firefox and thunderbird scripts that
for some reason were replaced by a simple copy of firefox-bin and
thunderbird-bin for an unkown reason. If the binary first looks
into /usr//lib/firefox, it of course gets the wrong (old) libraries.
Find attached my versions of these
On 15/10/2014 15:52, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
I'm inclined to suspect that you have an LD_LIBRARY_PATH defined
somewhere which redirects firefox to use wrong library versions ?
I'm inclined to suspect that firefox is totally broken since I am still using
Then why do I have no problems with it, even much less problems
than in all the years before with the older crashplayer versions ?
No, there's something wrong on your machines, we have a total of
22 machines with oi_151a7 and a9 where this all works absolutely
stable.
I have no idea! I
On 15/10/2014 15:52, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
I'm inclined to suspect that you have an LD_LIBRARY_PATH defined
somewhere which redirects firefox to use wrong library versions ?
I'm inclined to suspect that firefox is totally broken since I am still using
On 15/10/2014 16:28, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
You know that you HAVE TO go to this page to enable flash ?
Flash could be used if first you go to:
http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ and then flash would
temporarily work in a browser.
... Look I am using the browser
On 15/10/2014 16:41, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
It makes no sense, the Oracle firefox distributions are compiled
to work on THEIR modern Solaris 11.x versions, not the old 129a
Osol 2009.06.
Who said anything about 129a? I am using 134 the last OpenSolaris
release. Also, the name of the
On 10/15/14 04:49 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 15/10/2014 16:41, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
Who said anything about 129a? I am using 134 the last OpenSolaris
release. Also, the name of the binary distribution contains the word
This is not an official release, but was build as an interim
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:07:33 +0200, you wrote:
On 15/10/2014 15:52, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
I'm inclined to suspect that you have an LD_LIBRARY_PATH defined
somewhere which redirects firefox to use wrong library versions ?
I'm inclined to suspect that firefox is
Greetings,
Today I installed the 31.2.0esr release of firefox, obtained here:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/31.2.0esr/contrib/solar
is_pkgadd/firefox-31.2.0esr.en-US.opensolaris-i386-pkg.bz2
The system in question is running OpenIndiana oi151a7 (because it can
still
Hi,
I'm jumping in as the activity seems to increase after the bash bug lately and
there's a will to organise things.
I see a lot of people requesting Firefox and other Mozilla softwares, just to
to make sure everyone is aware that Mozilla still provides binaries for Solaris
platforms :
On 10/15/14 04:27 AM, benta...@chez.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm jumping in as the activity seems to increase after the bash bug lately and
there's a will to organise things.
I see a lot of people requesting Firefox and other Mozilla softwares, just to
to make sure everyone is aware that Mozilla still
On 10/15/14 04:06 AM, Marion Hakanson wrote:
Greetings,
Today I installed the 31.2.0esr release of firefox, obtained here:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/31.2.0esr/contrib/solar
is_pkgadd/firefox-31.2.0esr.en-US.opensolaris-i386-pkg.bz2
I used Firefox 31.1.1 ESR till
On 02/07/2014 19:41, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator] wrote:
Hi,
I have heard that those packages are compiled by Beijing (Sun/Oracle) team,
so I guess it depends on them.
It would be good for the community to develop its own capability
Hello,
I have noticed that there are no binaries for Firefox 30 and Firefox 31 beta.
Does anyone know a bit more about this?
Regards,
A.S.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
On 02/07/2014 16:31, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Hello,
I have noticed that there are no binaries for Firefox 30 and Firefox 31 beta.
Does anyone know a bit more about this?
It usually take a couple days until they appear, maybe longer if
the release has problems.
--
Hi,
I have heard that those packages are compiled by Beijing (Sun/Oracle) team, so
I guess it depends on them.
Regards.
On 07/ 2/14 04:31 PM, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Hello,
I have noticed that there are no binaries for Firefox 30 and Firefox 31 beta.
Does anyone
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator] wrote:
Hi,
I have heard that those packages are compiled by Beijing (Sun/Oracle) team,
so I guess it depends on them.
It would be good for the community to develop its own capability to
build and distribute Firefox.
There
Does anybody know where to find Firefox 30 for OpenIndiana?
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest-esr/contrib/
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Dmitry Kozhinov d...@desktopfay.com
wrote:
Does anybody know where to find Firefox 30 for OpenIndiana?
___
openindiana-discuss
That links to v24.6.0, not v30.
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest-esr/contrib/
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Ah, you're right. The newest I could find is 29 here
http://unixpackages.com/packages/mozilla
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Dmitry Kozhinov d...@desktopfay.com
wrote:
That links to v24.6.0, not v30.
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla.org/
Its (Firefox 30.0) not here yet, but if/when it does become available, I will
expect to be looking in the standard location:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/30.0/contrib/
Jerry
On 06/27/14 04:08 PM, Dmitry Kozhinov wrote:
Does anybody know where to find Firefox 30
Martin, I have a lot or respect for you. I follow your feed. I listen to
your rants and I help announce changes you have made to your version of
Illumos.
I know that you don't like me, or my comments, but can we please be civil
and not immediately go to a flame war?
Jon
Jonathan Adams writes:
Martin, I have a lot or respect for you. I follow your feed. I
listen to your rants and I help announce changes you have made to
your version of Illumos.
I know that you don't like me, or my comments, but can we please be
civil and not immediately go to a flame war?
Jonathan,
I have nothing against you, because you are not one of those who were
disrespectful towards me. You fell victim to collateral damage, I
apologize.
Let me thank you that you forwarded this subject to OI-discuss.
Only the term he claims and if somebody is still enough friends
with him
On 5/2/14, Volker A. Brandt v...@bb-c.de wrote:
Jonathan Adams writes:
Martin, I have a lot or respect for you. I follow your feed. I
listen to your rants and I help announce changes you have made to
your version of Illumos.
I know that you don't like me, or my comments, but can we please
What a huge contribution
fix you stuff youself
--
regards
%martin bochnig
http://svr4.opensxce.org/sparc/5.11/
http://opensxce.org/
http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/MartUX_OpenIndiana+oi_151a+SPARC+LiveDVD
http://www.youtube.com/user/MartUXopensolaris
On 2 May 2014 10:38, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
Only the term he claims and if somebody is still enough friends
with him were not your best choice, therefore my harsh reaction.
I'm sorry, you're right that they weren't the best choice of words ... the
he claims is only because I
youself
Here is the missing 'r'.
Whatever: UNSUBSCRIBE #2.
--
regards
%martin bochnig
http://svr4.opensxce.org/sparc/5.11/
http://opensxce.org/
http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/MartUX_OpenIndiana+oi_151a+SPARC+LiveDVD
http://www.youtube.com/user/MartUXopensolaris
In message CABiyw5hLWjSJSjrMNYO6G-PBxCNHk83bt+r1EW1L=tSN7c=m...@mail.gmail.com
, Martin Bochnig writes:
Only the term he claims and if somebody is still enough friends
with him were not your best choice, therefore my harsh reaction.
+1.
Friendship has nothing to do with it.
Congratulations for
I don't know if there is anything in it, or if anyone here is still friends
enough with Martin, but he claims that he's worked out what causes flash to
behave really badly (and even what causes it to crash Gnome ...)
Yes, I claim that.
And soon everybody can download OpenSXCE2014.05 x86/x64 and (a bit later) SPARC.
Then you see, if there is anything in it, or if anyone here is still friends
enough with Martin
The questions is not who is still friends enough with me, but with
whom ___I___'m still friends
Hi Jerry,
final version wasn't available yesterday morning.
Will give it a try... of course.
Regards.
On 04/29/14 11:47 PM, Jerry Kemp wrote:
Hello Predrag,
thanks for the reminder note.
It looks like it has been a while since anyone has posted a non-beta version of
Thunderbird.
However,
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 12:48 AM, Jerry Kemp sun.mail.lis...@oryx.cc
wrote:
Hello Predrag,
thanks for the reminder note.
It looks like it has been a while since anyone has posted a non-beta version
of
Thunderbird.
However, it looks like Firefox 29 is available here:
On 30/04/2014 09:08, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 12:48 AM, Jerry Kemp sun.mail.lis...@oryx.cc
wrote:
Hello Predrag,
thanks for the reminder note.
It looks like it has been a while since anyone has posted a non-beta version of
Thunderbird.
However, it looks like
On 04/30/14 09:08 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 12:48 AM, Jerry Kemp sun.mail.lis...@oryx.cc
wrote:
Hello Predrag,
thanks for the reminder note.
It looks like it has been a while since anyone has posted a non-beta version of
Thunderbird.
However, it looks
After deleting .mozilla/firefox it works.
A.S.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Hi all,
just tried latest 29 beta TAR versions from Mozilla site:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/releases/29.0b1/contrib/solaris_tarball/thunderbird-29.0b1.en-US.opensolaris-i386.tar.bz2
Hello Predrag,
thanks for the reminder note.
It looks like it has been a while since anyone has posted a non-beta version of
Thunderbird.
However, it looks like Firefox 29 is available here:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/29.0/contrib/solaris_tarball/
Is there a
On 04/14/14 06:47 PM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
What puzzles me is that a few minutes ago FF28 didn't want to download the
source code of Git 1.9.0 (empty file), but after I read your mail I was
able to successfully download FF24 as a tarball from within the same FF28
instance. Very
Also in FF28 (for both OS and Linux OS) tar files:
$ tar tvf firefox-28.0.en-US.opensolaris-i386.tar.bz2 | grep omni
-rw-r--r-- 0/04314930 2014-03-17 04:38 firefox/browser/omni.ja
-rw-r--r-- 0/0 44757 2014-03-17 04:38 firefox/webapprt/omni.ja
-rw-r--r-- 0/0
Hi,
recently I did a fresh install of OI Hipster in VMware Fusion on my Mac by
using the latest ISO image available at
http://dlc.openindiana.org/isos/hipster/, applied all updates via pkg
image-update -v and added a few additional packages. So far, a quite
plain vanilla installation.
any particular reason for using 28, rather than the most recent ESR?
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest-esr/contrib/solaris_pkgadd/
24.4 seems to work happily for me ...
Jon
On 14 April 2014 15:46, Thorsten Heit thorsten.h...@vkb.de wrote:
Hi,
recently I did a
any particular reason for using 28, rather than the most recent ESR?
It's newer? :-)
*scnr*
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest-esr/
contrib/solaris_pkgadd/
24.4 seems to work happily for me ...
Yes, I saw that in the mailing list archive. Tried that just a
writing messages to this list seems to (at least temporarily) fix the
problem being reported in Firefox ... I think it reads the messages and
subtly alters it's usage ;-P
On 14 April 2014 16:08, Thorsten Heit thorsten.h...@vkb.de wrote:
any particular reason for using 28, rather than the most
On 04/14/14 09:58 AM, Thorsten Heit wrote:
Hi,
just after I posted my mail I discovered that FF28 obviously shows the
same (mis-)behaviour as was discussed a few weeks ago in the thread
Firefox can't save files (
http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2014-March/015308.html
):
I'm interested if anyone else has an issue like mine ...
I am running OI hipster on a majority Intel laptop (Intel network, Intel
graphics, etc.) and there are sites that just crash and burn my browser if
I try going to them. I assumed that it was something to do with the
hardware acceleration
Gah! ... I knew it.
It's been happening for months ( 6) and the second I send an email the
problem disappears!
Please ignore.
On 26 March 2014 10:24, Jonathan Adams t12nsloo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm interested if anyone else has an issue like mine ...
I am running OI hipster on a majority
On 03/26/2014 14:24, Jonathan Adams wrote:
I'm interested if anyone else has an issue like mine ...
I am running OI hipster on a majority Intel laptop (Intel network, Intel
graphics, etc.) and there are sites that just crash and burn my browser if
I try going to them. I assumed that it was
I logged out of my machine, and logged in as another user (user was in
LDAP, not on local machine, gdm didn't start until user existed in files)
and everything appeared to work for that user ...
I untarred my .mozilla directory onto his, and it carried on working.
I logged out and logged in as
In message 5330e0ae.7010...@oryx.cc, Jerry Kemp writes:
This has kind of quieted down, and I am wondering if others are still seeing
this issue, or if it has resolved itself.
I missed Apostolos' responses to the questions whether
he tried to reproduce with a virgin user account and with
a local
I missed Apostolos' responses to the questions whether
he tried to reproduce with a virgin user account and with
a local home directory to rule out a corrupted FF config
or a FF bug with NFS/CIFS.
Not a virgin account but one where I had deleted the .mozilla folder.
However, let me
I might try to archive then remove my $HOME/.mozilla directory, and see if that
does any good.
Again, thanks for the comments.
Jerry
On 03/25/14 10:54 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
I missed Apostolos' responses to the questions whether
he tried to reproduce with a virgin user account
Just a status update. I archived then removed my $HOME/.mozilla directory.
Aside from wiping out everything I would expect it to, nothing was fixed or
resolved.
FWIW, I have been using the OpenSolaris version of Firefox 27 28.
Anyway, I still had a copy of the OpenSolaris version 25.0.1
This has kind of quieted down, and I am wondering if others are still seeing
this issue, or if it has resolved itself.
I just upgraded from 27 to 28.0, and made an attempt to download a new copy of
thunderbird. For me, nothing has changed, from the download window, it is
indicated that the
On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:21 AM, Oscar del Rio del...@mie.utoronto.ca
wrote:
On 03/19/14 11:06 AM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 18/03/2014 17:05, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator] wrote:
I am not changing anything: just FF27 doesn't and FF24esr does save
files (between them
On 03/20/14 09:25 AM, Fred Kimball wrote:
After reading these emails I rebooted into a9, moved the 26.0 firefox directory
to firefox-26.0 and extracted 28.0. Files are downloaded as expected. Hmmm?
I always extract the tarball to a new directory, never on top of a
previous version.
e.g.
Hello,
I have installed version 28.0 and now I cannot install
any addon and of course I cannot save files (I tried to save
an e-mail attachment and it failed). I am sure the problem is
this stupid SunStudio that they are using to compile firefox.
I will send a bug report.
A.S.
Le 2014/03/19 11:51 +0100, Apostolos Syropoulos a écrit:
I have installed version 28.0 and now I cannot install
any addon and of course I cannot save files (I tried to save
an e-mail attachment and it failed). I am sure the problem is
this stupid SunStudio that they are using to compile firefox.
Have you tried the Solaris 10 version?
First, let me repeat that the binary works just fine under OpenSolaris 134.
Second I haven't tried this but I think it should not work.
A.S.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
___
On 19/03/2014 11:36, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
Hello,
I have installed version 28.0 and now I cannot install
any addon and of course I cannot save files (I tried to save
an e-mail attachment and it failed). I am sure the problem is
this stupid SunStudio that they are using to compile firefox.
On 03/19/14 01:32 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 19/03/2014 11:36, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
Hello,
I have installed version 28.0 and now I cannot install
any addon and of course I cannot save files (I tried to save
an e-mail attachment and it failed). I am sure the problem is
this stupid
Le 2014/03/19 15:19 +0100, Apostolos Syropoulos a écrit:
First, let me repeat that the binary works just fine under OpenSolaris 134.
Second I haven't tried this but I think it should not work.
I think you should, because the S10 version embeds plenty of the
dependencies (so if it's an S11-OI
On 19/03/2014 15:22, Laurent Blume wrote:
Le 2014/03/19 15:19 +0100, Apostolos Syropoulos a écrit:
First, let me repeat that the binary works just fine under OpenSolaris 134.
Second I haven't tried this but I think it should not work.
I think you should, because the S10 version embeds plenty
Le 2014/03/19 15:36 +0100, IMK a écrit:
Again, there's no binary incompatibility , with oi-151a9
firefox WORKS.
And I had missed he was complaining about it on S11 too. So it's just
locally broken.
Laurent
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing
On 18/03/2014 17:05, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator] wrote:
Hi,
it looks like FF compilation:
I am not changing anything: just FF27 doesn't and FF24esr does save
files (between them is just pkgrm and pkgadd)
Hmm, maybe there's different content in the package installer ?
I'm
On 19/03/2014 11:36, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
I have installed version 28.0 and now I cannot install
any addon ...
You know that you have to relocate installed browser plugins
in the /usr/lib/firefox/plugins/ directory to
/usr/lib/firefox/browser/plugins/ ?
--
Dr.Udo Grabowski
On 19/03/2014 20:00, cpforum wrote:
-rw-r--r-- 1 cp staff 43268404 2014-03-19 19:43
firefox-28.0.en-US.opensolaris-i386.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 cp staff 43277734 2014-03-19 19:48
firefox-28.0b9.en-US.opensolaris-i386.tar.bz2
Are not the same.
Try your browser for HTML5 http://html5test.com
OI
On 03/19/14 07:29 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 19/03/2014 20:00, cpforum wrote:
-rw-r--r-- 1 cp staff 43268404 2014-03-19 19:43
firefox-28.0.en-US.opensolaris-i386.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 cp staff 43277734 2014-03-19 19:48
firefox-28.0b9.en-US.opensolaris-i386.tar.bz2
Are not the same.
Hello,
I am using firefox 27.0.1 and I have noticed that whenever I save a file,
firefox creates an empty file. The real file is stored in /tmp. I guess this
is a bug. BTW, I have noticed this problem on openindiana/illumos-ad17c01 and
Solaris 11.
Regards,
A.S.
--
On 18/03/2014 09:32, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
Hello,
I am using firefox 27.0.1 and I have noticed that whenever I save a file,
firefox creates an empty file. The real file is stored in /tmp. I guess this
is a bug. BTW, I have noticed this problem on openindiana/illumos-ad17c01 and
On 03/18/14 09:32 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
Hello,
I am using firefox 27.0.1 and I have noticed that whenever I save a file,
firefox creates an empty file. The real file is stored in /tmp. I guess this
is a bug. BTW, I have noticed this problem on openindiana/illumos-ad17c01 and
Firefox is downloading on /tmp typically and AFTER completion,
moves it to the final location. Meanwhile, the final file exists
as a dummy with size zero. So AFTER download, the final file should
have the correct size.
--
The problem is that it has zero size. That's why I posted my
18 марта 2014 г. 9:32:18 CET, Apostolos Syropoulos asyropou...@yahoo.com
пишет:
Hello,
I am using firefox 27.0.1 and I have noticed that whenever I save a
file,
firefox creates an empty file. The real file is stored in /tmp. I
guess this
is a bug. BTW, I have noticed this problem on
On 03/18/14 04:32 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
I am using firefox 27.0.1 and I have noticed that whenever I save a file,
firefox creates an empty file. The real file is stored in /tmp. I guess this
is a bug. BTW, I have noticed this problem on openindiana/illumos-ad17c01 and
Solaris 11.
the lines of FF being allowed to create files but not write to them?
Cheers
Stefan
Von: Oscar del Rio [del...@mie.utoronto.ca]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. März 2014 16:59
An: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Betreff: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox can't
An: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Betreff: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox can't save files
On 03/18/14 04:32 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
I am using firefox 27.0.1 and I have noticed that whenever I save a file,
firefox creates an empty file. The real file is stored in /tmp. I guess
:
Objet : Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox can't save files
On 18/03/2014 17:05, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator] wrote:
Hi,
it looks like FF compilation:
I am not changing anything: just FF27 doesn't and FF24esr does save
files (between them is just pkgrm and pkgadd
I have The same problem in ff 26.0 on OI u7 . Running firefox from the
command line gives the following error:
WORKER ERROR DURING SETUP Error: couldn't find function symbol in
library
WORKER ERROR DETAIL
@resource://gre/modules/osfile/osfile_unix_allthreads.jsm:72
Le 2014/02/14 09:41 +0100, Bob Friesenhahn a écrit:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, cpforum wrote:
New firefox 24.3.0esr and 27.0 are available on Mozilla.
How evident/obvious is the built in advertising feature in 27?
Bob
Is that supposed to be in 27 already? I've not noticed anything in the
New firefox 24.3.0esr and 27.0 are available on Mozilla.
How evident/obvious is the built in advertising feature in 27?
Nor advertising feature nor shumway (flash) extension seems to be inside
Firefox 27.
about:config show nothing obvious that could be related with advertising.
Mozilla
On 02/14/14 11:14 AM, cpforum wrote:
New firefox 24.3.0esr and 27.0 are available on Mozilla.
How evident/obvious is the built in advertising feature in 27?
Nor advertising feature nor shumway (flash) extension seems to be inside
Firefox 27.
about:config show nothing obvious that could be
New firefox 24.3.0esr and 27.0 are available on Mozilla.
26 and 27 release have the same HTML5 score (score=399) on the HTML5
conformance test site. Strange the Solaris10 Firefox 26/27 score is 401/403) :
http://html5test.com/
This site is very interesting to compare browser or same browser
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, cpforum wrote:
New firefox 24.3.0esr and 27.0 are available on Mozilla.
How evident/obvious is the built in advertising feature in 27?
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,
I generally stick to the latest ESR version, which is currently 24:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest-esr/contrib/solaris_pkgadd/
I have installed Java JDK 1.7u45 and it's working for me:
I am have updated to FF24 and Thunderbird they seem to be stable releases
Rob
On 07/11/2013 00:29, John D Groenveld wrote:
In message527ac156.3060...@2e-systems.com, Predrag Zecevic writes:
i am using FF24
(ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/24.0/contrib/solaris_pkgadd/f=
In message 527ac156.3060...@2e-systems.com, Predrag Zecevic writes:
i am using FF24
(ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/24.0/contrib/solaris_pkgadd/f=
irefox-24.0.en-US.opensolaris-i386-pkg.bz2)
25.0 addresses some security issue:
Hi,
I had the same trouble with ff 20. I have updated to 20.0.1 and the bug
seems to be gone (otherwise I would be unable to write this mail...)
Yours
Olaf
2013/4/16 Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
I tried as well with the
I tried as well with the tar.bz2 package, and it is the same crash and core
dump.
The problem has been fixed and the reason was a compiler error. I just wonder
why they keep compiling with SolarisStudio?
A.S.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
I tried as well with the tar.bz2 package, and it is the same crash and core
dump.
The problem has been fixed and the reason was a compiler error. I just wonder
why they keep compiling with SolarisStudio?
It avoids needing to depend on GCC
I'm using Firefox 20 and Thunderbird 20 right now. Although I don't use
gmail, I haven't had crashing problems. Though, I started having trouble
opening links from Thunderbird to Firefox. For http, I had to change
Thunderbird to directly point to my Firefox directory and startup file,
101 - 200 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
