--- Original Message - From: Harry Putnam To:
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org Sent: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:17:48 -
(UTC) Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] funky beginer questionsLou
Picciano writes: > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . There are also some
ZFS >
On 11/09/2013 16:40, Harry Putnam wrote:
"Udo Grabowski (IMK)" writes:
[...]
Harry wrote:
So you'd need to send/receive all seven then, eh? Or is there
something like the -p operator to 'zfs create -p [...]' that can be
invoked to allow you to send/receive the whole batch in one go?
Udo
"Udo Grabowski (IMK)" writes:
[...]
Harry wrote:
>> So you'd need to send/receive all seven then, eh? Or is there
>> something like the -p operator to 'zfs create -p [...]' that can be
>> invoked to allow you to send/receive the whole batch in one go?
>>
>
Udo replied:
> You can always do a 'z
Antony Brooke-Wood writes:
> My advice is to keep it simple - from what you describe, there isn't any
> reason I can see to create more than 2 file systems.
I kind of thought that might be best, but then started noticing how
the designers of openindiana have gone fairly deep into the sets of
zfs
"Udo Grabowski (IMK)" writes:
> From 7 years of experience with zfs I absolutely recommend to
> go the other way, create filesystems below /rmh/... for each
> host. The simple reason is that you can easily snapshot each
> host, transport it, or even promote it to be the root on a real
> physical
On 11/09/2013 16:13, Harry Putnam wrote:
"Udo Grabowski (IMK)" writes:
From 7 years of experience with zfs I absolutely recommend to
go the other way, create filesystems below /rmh/... for each
host. The simple reason is that you can easily snapshot each
host, transport it, or even promote it
Lou Picciano writes:
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . There are also some ZFS
> attributes geared toward Windows FSes; you'll want to check these
> out.
Thank you for the helpful input. Although it does sound like your
operation and thinking are a bit above my pay grade ;).
Can you menti
On 11/09/2013 01:44, Antony Brooke-Wood wrote:
My advice is to keep it simple - from what you describe, there isn't any
reason I can see to create more than 2 file systems.
One thing you might consider is setting up CrashPlan with your server.
It has a native solaris installation and for $5 a m
Harry,
Wish there were one answer… Even before ZFS layout, zpool design brings a lot
of factors into play. But to your question on layouts: Among our considerations
is the one you're dealing with; 'How granular to get?'
Some features of ZFS help drive our thinking about our architectures: The
My advice is to keep it simple - from what you describe, there isn't any
reason I can see to create more than 2 file systems.
One thing you might consider is setting up CrashPlan with your server.
It has a native solaris installation and for $5 a month, you can have all
of your data replicated of
Running 151a8
Now I've got oi running and becoming slightly familiar with zpool and
zfs cmds, I need some coaching as to how to employ the zfs fs.
My general aim is to backup other computers but also want to have a
few zfs fs that serve a windows 7 box and holds lots of pictures and
other graphic
11 matches
Mail list logo
