On 11/28/14 06:25 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
If it’s C++, the name mangling is different; look up the options for the Sun
and GNU versions of nm respectively, use each version of nm with its
demangling option, and whichever has sensible output corresponds to the
compiler used.
Even with
Wouldn't this break the binary compatibility guarantee that Solaris had
been traditionally marketed on?
I'm no kernel engineer, so I wouldn't know.
'With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the
first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/7/2014 5:26 PM, Alex Smith (K4RNT) wrote:
Wouldn't this break the binary compatibility guarantee that Solaris
had been traditionally marketed on?
I'm no kernel engineer, so I wouldn't know.
No. The guarantee has always been that *IF* your
On 12/ 7/14 02:50 PM, James Carlson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/7/2014 5:26 PM, Alex Smith (K4RNT) wrote:
Wouldn't this break the binary compatibility guarantee that Solaris
had been traditionally marketed on?
I'm no kernel engineer, so I wouldn't know.
No.
Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hello.
I'd like to hear about people who now hardly depends on Sun
Studio-compiled C++ libraries AND use OpenIndiana. Do you have software
which can't be recompiled with GCC? Do you know commercial software
which depend on the libraries?
I mean the following OI
Hi Alexander,
while not exactly in your problem class, I have a similar case: compiling httpd
modules (e.g. mod_security in my case) using gcc will make httpd crash on
startup. You either need Sun Studio or drop the packaged Apache and compile
yourself. So this is another case where it would
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014, Tim Mooney wrote:
On a tangentially related note, does anyone know of any tests that
compare the performance of generated code between Studio and gcc/g++?
I haven't seen one in years, so I would be interested to know how much
gcc has closed the performance gap with Studio?
Hello,
I am using OI 151a9 with some server packages installed (some of them
from opencsw.org), but I have no idea which libraries they depend on, or
which compiler was used to compile the packages or required libraries.
Just hope that OI will remain compatible/usable in the future.
If it’s plain C, it shouldn’t matter. If it’s C++, the name mangling is
different; look up the options for the Sun and GNU versions of nm respectively,
use each version of nm with its demangling option, and whichever has sensible
output corresponds to the compiler used.
Here’s an example,
