What I'm referring to is data that is already available to the packager
that is not being used effectively. It's only applied to JNLP data or
something, when it can also apply to the resources in the launcher exe. I
think the two issues are distinct.
Scott
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Mark
Changeset: 2872be3a2984
Author:hudson
Date: 2014-01-10 09:30 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/graphics/rt/rev/2872be3a2984
Added tag 8.0-b123 for changeset 423cf238579d
! .hgtags
Changeset: 9689bfae29b8
Author:mv157916
Date: 2014-01-10 15:05 -0800
URL:
Changeset: 26f87c5d3435
Author:hudson
Date: 2014-01-03 06:56 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt/rev/26f87c5d3435
Added tag 8.0-b122 for changeset dd789066e61e
! .hgtags
Changeset: 44acc56c806e
Author:mv157916
Date: 2014-01-03 13:32 -0800
URL: ht
Comments in-line
>
> I just started experimenting with the javafxpackager and I noticed that the
> .exe that is created could, and probably should, have more things
> customized in the resources. If you get properties on the file in Windows
> and look at the Details tab, things like Product name
Comments inline…
On Jan 10, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Danno Ferrin wrote:
> I came on board working on the packager stuff last month. Nearly all of the
> design decisions for this were made before I came on board, but I will do my
> best to explain it.
>
>
> I'm wondering why not make java.exe the
If there are extra points, then Martin is going to get a whole pile of
them for the oldest feature with RT-153 (alwaysOnTop). So what do you
and he win? More bugs to fix? :)
-- Kevin
Stephen F Northover wrote:
Hi Anthony,
Please review https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-4169. It's an
Hi Anthony,
Please review https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-4169. It's an old
one.
Should there be extra points for fixing the oldest bug ever?
Thanks,
Steve
Hi Danno,
It's really great to see someone paying close attention to the packaging and
deployment stuff, this level of effort has been sorely missed since Igor and
Daniel left.
Thanks for the contributions.
John
-Original Message-
From: openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net
[mailto:op
Changeset: 44acc56c806e
Author:mv157916
Date: 2014-01-03 13:32 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/master/rt/rev/44acc56c806e
RT-35171: Update the JDK 8 build number to b122 in rt/build.properties file in
the JavaFX 8 Master forest.
! build.properties
Changeset: 5aca7
>> An "application bundle mode" could probably be
>> triggered via the contents of a resource that is injected much like the
>> custom icon is injected into the fx launcher (I'm not sure if something
>> needs to be done for preloader support too. I think the embedded launcher
>> stub handles that
I came on board working on the packager stuff last month. Nearly all of
the design decisions for this were made before I came on board, but I will
do my best to explain it.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Scott Palmer wrote:
> The Java 8 java.exe launcher is now JavaFX aware in that it will la
Thanks David. I know this is painful but in the end we'll be in a
better place.
Steve
On 2014-01-10 8:38 AM, David Grieve wrote:
I'm going to take a pass at bugs assigned to Mick.
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20RT%20AND%20issuetype%20%3D%20Bug%20AND%20resolution%2
I'm going to take a pass at bugs assigned to Mick.
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20RT%20AND%20issuetype%20%3D%20Bug%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20assignee%20%3D%20mickf
If I get through that list, I'll start in on
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/issues/?j
13 matches
Mail list logo
