On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 09:52 +0200, Tom Eugelink wrote:
> Totally off topic, I apologise, but the subscribers to this list are the type
> of people who may have the experience I seek.
>
> I've been trying to pitch the concept of named parameters for Java 9, but
> somehow my JEP is never picked up
I did not mean to include anything from Intel
My own research appears to indicate jdk8 will run edison
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 27, 2015, at 2:52 PM, Kevin Rushforth
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Mike wrote:
>> Does Intel Edison run jdk8 u40?
>
> [off topic advertisement for Intel Edison cut]
>
Mike wrote:
Does Intel Edison run jdk8 u40?
[off topic advertisement for Intel Edison cut]
Did you mean to send what looks like an advertisement for Intel Edison,
or just you just cut and paste from Intel's web site? I'll presume the
latter, since it would be inappropriate to spam the l
Heh. Welcome to Unicode :(
Unfortunately, many file systems especially in the UNIX world do not
precisely specify how file names are to be encoded. Some of them treat file
names as opaque null terminated byte arrays.
Thus this may not be a bug in Java so much as a design problem/oversight
with th
We have an RFE filed to deliver such as a utility / sample:
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-37899
-- Kevin
Jack Moxley wrote:
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On 26 Apr 2015, at 03:49, offbynull-openjfx
wrote:
When will we get lookAt and lookAt bindings for JavaFX's Camera classes?
I
