I am sorry if this is a question you would prefer not to answer but I
believe the answer is significant.
I am sure the entire JavaFX community would love to know if Oracle "eats
their own dog food" so to speak.
Felix
On 9 June 2016 at 10:02, Felix Bembrick wrote:
> So, if I'm not correct, does
I am just curious, why is the system property to enable "full speed
animations" in JavaFX applications NOT set to "true" by default?
Thanks,
Felix
I suspect that particular plugin is extremely rarely used, judging by
https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=%22javafx-mx.jar%22&type=Code&ref=searchresults
showing 0 results.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 09.06.2016 00:31, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
As some of you may be aware, JavaFX has shipped
I am taking that as a "yes" answer to my original question.
On a completely unrelated topic, do Microsoft employees all have Macs on their
desktops and carry iPhones and iPads around?
No?
Well I bet Apple employees do!
> On 10 Jun 2016, at 20:01, dalibor topic wrote:
>
> I suspect that parti
What has the removal of JMX for JavaFX todo with Oracle using JavaFX
themselves?
There are projects at Oracle who for sure do use JavaFX and one of them
is installed in your JDK! It's Java-Mission-Control.
Tom
On 10.06.16 12:46, Felix Bembrick wrote:
> I am taking that as a "yes" answer to my or
I never heard of this until this thread. And after googling I still have no
clue what it is. I think that explains some of why it is rarely used.
Scott
> On Jun 10, 2016, at 6:01 AM, dalibor topic wrote:
>
> I suspect that particular plugin is extremely rarely used, judging by
> https://githu
Unfortunately, it has a lot to do with it.
Do you actually realise how much of the entire JMC is written using JavaFX?
(Not to mention what percentage of Java developers even know about or use JMC).
Please check and then feel free to respond and enlighten us all with your
findings. 100%? At le
Okay this thread is about what to do with javafx jmx plugin. How does that
even relate to whether oracle is using javafx internally?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016, 7:52 PM Felix Bembrick
wrote:
> Unfortunately, it has a lot to do with it.
>
> Do you actually realise how much of the entire JMC is written
Did you even read the email you are replying to? Or the email I was myself
replying to?
If I have spell it out so bluntly that everyone can understand then I will only
get myself into further trouble with the "Big O".
I used a technique known locally as "sarcasm". It's sort of the default mode
Felix, unfortunately your original question was not parse-able.
Before you go on prolonging this thread with more of that, please consider that
this mailing list is for discussion of ongoing OpenJFX development.
If instead you would prefer to discuss something else, please do try to find a
mor
Dalibor, please forgive me for assuming that Oracle had access to an English
language parser. I could translate my original question into Klingon and
resubmit if that would help.
And thanks so much for pointing out to me that this forum is devoted to
"ongoing OpenJFX development". Clearly I wa
Reminder, Monday is our weekly sanity testing.
You can find your testing assignment at:
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Sanity+Testing
Also please remember that the repo will be locked from 1am PST until 1pm
PST.
Happy testing!
Thanks,
Vadim
Back to the original topic, since JMX is used to monitor servers and
applications, and since most of us don't write monitoring software, the
audience for it is by definition small.
I would imagine that Oracle and perhaps a Cisco (or companies involved in
network monitoring) would be interested, bu
Hi,
In Java9 PlatformImpl.startup was provide as API in Platform which is
great but not enough to solve my current problem.
Let me start with the following I can not use Application.launch() to
bootstrap my OSGi-Application because this would block endless because
if the native launching going on
Kudos on the "imagination" part...
You are at least possibly right about Cisco.
And your quote "but only if they knew it wasn't going to disappear" is a nice
summary of the intent of my reasonable question that never got "officially"
answered.
But then again, it was somewhat rhetorical in natu
15 matches
Mail list logo
