And, to clarify, the super-lazy property fix is currently only targeted to JDK10. A case would need to be made to
back-port it to any update releases once it is fixed there. We haven't seen or presented such a case at this point so
we are only planning to fix it in JDK10 and Tom has indicated t
As mentionned at the beginning of the thread, in FX8 you can roll your
custom implementation. I did not yet had the time to test the changes
Jim made :-(
Tom
On 27.07.17 13:41, Jose Martinez wrote:
> Just curious, did this make it to the 8u144 release? If not, any idea
> which release (or when)
No, this fix hasn't yet been reviewed and pushed. When it is it will go
into JDK 10.
-- Kevin
Jose Martinez wrote:
Just curious, did this make it to the 8u144 release? If not, any idea which
release (or when) we can expect it?
Thank youjose
On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 08:38:41
Just curious, did this make it to the 8u144 release? If not, any idea which
release (or when) we can expect it?
Thank youjose
On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 08:38:41 PM EDT, Jim Graham
wrote:
Thanks Tom, I've already posted a patch for 8180938 (lazy property creation).
Check i
Hi,
Please review the following changset,
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arajkumar/8185132/webrev
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8185132
Detailed analysis is updated as JBS comment.
Thanks,
Arun
