Re: [10] Review request: 8179033: javapackager fails to create Mac Application Bundle

On 12/2/17 7:11 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: Michael Hall wrote: On Dec 2, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Kevin Rushforth mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>> wrote: Michael Hall wrote: On Dec 1, 2017, at 7:43 PM, victor.droz...@oracle.com wrote: Kevin, Please r

Re: Proposal For Inclusion of Robot and ParametersImpl in the Public API

I am still working on all the necessary changes to actually allow openjfx to compile. Tons to learn in that arena and I know the code as it is written won't totally work. For example one can no longer: #include "com_sun_glass_ui_Robot.h" as in openjfx\modules\javafx.graphics\src\main\native-glass

Re: Error on build

Try changing line 275 of the root build.gradle from: ext.IS_64 = OS_ARCH.toLowerCase().contains("64") to: ext.IS_64 = true On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 6:24 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > I possess an AMD 64 bit machine. > > My JDK_HOME points to a 64 bit JDK. > > MS C++ redistributables reported as install

Proposal For Inclusion of Robot and ParametersImpl in the Public API

I have created a (small) proposal (building on the work of Benjamin Gudehaus) about moving some classes in to the public API so that TestFX (a JavaFX UI testing framework) can continue to work with future JDK releases. The somewhat nicely formatted proposal can be found as a Github gist: https://g