On 9/24/18 2:12 AM, Johan Vos wrote:
> And it's only going to get worse as time goes on. Would it not be
> possible to support up until the last JDK LTS(Starting at 11)
release
> for building JavaFX? I feel like maybe that would be more
reasonable.
This is a good ques
Thanks Sam, that solved it. For some reason I was thinking that if you
don't specify the platform it downloads a version with all native
dependencies for cross compilation.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 2:37 AM Sam Carlberg wrote:
> The libraries are in artifacts with platform-specific classifiers. Th
The libraries are in artifacts with platform-specific classifiers. The
artifacts with no classifiers that you currently depend on are completely
empty.
You need to depend on "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform", where the
platform is one of "win", "mac", or "linux".
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 5:18 P
Hi,
I haven't kept up with all of the Maven artifacts discussion. The website
mentioned in 2 places that there are maven artifacts, but does not mention
their ID's, group etc. These are the downloads page [1] and the getting
started page [2] (later you can see an example pom, but that doesn't coun
Yes, that seems like a good bit of additional cleanup. I'll do that.
-- Kevin
On 9/25/2018 1:41 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Removal looks ok but one thing, do we still need to keep the
enhanced-for loop in InterOpFactory.java#getInstance now that we have
only 1 factory? I guess
Hi Kevin,
Removal looks ok but one thing, do we still need to keep the
enhanced-for loop in InterOpFactory.java#getInstance now that we have
only 1 factory? I guess we can probably remove the whole reflection
thing also and instantiate InteropFactoryN directly, no?
Regards
Prasanta
On 22-Sep
