Summary
---
* Simplify and update the Gtk glass backend, making Linux a first-class OpenJFX
platform.
PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/77
Goals
-
* Make Linux a first-class OpenJFX platform (see Motivation);
* Simplify the code and reduce it's size;
* Update to gtk3 (it was orig
> ### Summary
> * Simplify and update the Gtk glass backend, making Linux a first-class
> OpenJFX platform.
>
> ### Goals
> * Make Linux a first-class OpenJFX platform (see Motivation);
> * Simplify the code and reduce it's size;
> * Update to gtk3 (it was originally a port from gtk2);
> * Remove
Hi Kevin,
On 03.04.2020 01:21, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> I see that you updated the PR and sent it for review.
>
> Before we formally review it in the PR, let's finish the discussion as to
> whether this is a useful
> feature, and if so, what form this feature should take.
>
> From my point of vie
On 04.04.2020 03:25, Eric Bresie wrote:
> Are you behind a proxy? I had problems with another application which
> required registering certificates and related credentials keys to be added
> for java.
No, no proxy server (my setup has direct access).
---rony
> On April 2, 2020 at 2:20:44 PM
On 02.04.2020 21:20, Johan Vos wrote:
> I have no scientific evidence for this, but I remember issues related to SSL
> with some JDK's as
> well, which may or may not be related to the cacerts file that is bundled.
When hitting this problem the JDK was the same that has worked flawlessly with
th
In general a discussion like this can happen in the pull request as part
of the review. All PR comments are forwarded to the mailing list anyway.
-- Kevin
On 4/4/2020 3:21 AM, Jeanette Winzenburg wrote:
as an example take f.i.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129123 (and its pull re
as an example take f.i.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129123 (and its pull request
https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/136 with a good starter to a
solution) has open questions - for me, at least :)
Places to discuss: the pull request? the mailing list? the issue?
Where wou
My use case which is driving the fix for this bug is user expectation in an
open source application (https://github.com/ccavanaugh/jgnash).
When a user makes an edit to an existing transaction, the expectation is
the prior selected ComboBox value is visible when the list is displayed,
otherwise it
> This pull request fixes JDK-8129123. This bug also effects Windows and Linux
> platforms.
> Also, I believe JDK-8196037 is a duplicate of this issue.
>
> I've tested this against OpenJDK 11.0.6 on Ubuntu 18.04, Arch Linux and
> Windows 10.
>
> Thanks!
Craig Cavanaugh has updated the pull re
