On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 16:39:07 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
>>> @AlexanderScherbatiy Did you move the _javafx.platform.properties_ file to
>>> its parent directory manually, as I just did?
>>
>> I used the full version of jdk 14.0.1 on Raspberry Pi where JavaFX is
>> included in jdk so the file
>
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:20:02 GMT, Alexander Scherbatiy
wrote:
> To debug the JavaFX on Raspberry Pi I built armv6hf-sdk and just copied the
> file _javafx.platform.properties_ from the
> full jdk version with JavaFX to jdk-14.0.1/lib directory of jdk without
> JavaFX which I used to run my jav
Yes, windows. I can run on a Mac, but it's just a laptop with the standard
Intel HD Graphics card.
-Original Message-
From: openjfx-dev On Behalf Of Kevin
Rushforth
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:59 PM
To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RE; Community request to
Thanks, I will give it a shot.
Jesper
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:45 PM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> That's an interesting idea that might be worth pursuing. It would help
> mitigate what has been a long-standing pain point for developers who
> don't want to build media or web, but would like to run
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 14:05:27 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> I have not reviewed the code but have only tested it.
Thanks for taking an initial look :) Just keep in mind that this issue is
focused on displaying of the box' value
reliably.
> The value of index is not defined when an uncontained it
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:16:57 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> The issue is that ChoiceBoxSkin
>> a) doesn't update the text of the label if the value is not contained in the
>> items
>> b) doesn't respect converter for label text
>>
>> Fixed by
>> - listening to value changes to update the label
Hi Ty Young,
Thank you for reverting back.
Basic documentation has not changed since JavaFX 11.
Since it is difficult to keep up with the ever changing IDEs, we added a
disclaimer on the top of each IDE section denoting the JavaFX and IDE version
used for the tutorial.
And as always, in case
On 4/24/20 2:14 AM, Abhinay Agarwal wrote:
Hi Ty Young,
I am trying to identify which part of the documentation changed after
JavaFX 13. The JVM arguments that you have specified are required
since JavaFX 11. Alternatively, user doesn't need to pass these
arguments if they are using javafx-
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 01:27:42 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
>> Wow, this is going to take some getting used to. 😃 Below is a photograph of
>> the button and text with two changes:
>>
>> 1. the code from this pull request, and
>> 2. the `javafx.platform.properties` file moved to its parent director
Hi Ty Young,
I am trying to identify which part of the documentation changed after JavaFX
13. The JVM arguments that you have specified are required since JavaFX 11.
Alternatively, user doesn't need to pass these arguments if they are using
javafx-maven-plugin to build and run the application.
10 matches
Mail list logo
