Currently, the two themes shipped with JavaFX (Caspian and Modena) are
implemented as a set of stylesheets and some internal logic, mostly in
`PlatformImpl`.
Much of this logic deals with optional features or platform-specific
theme modifications. Another piece of logic deals with accessibility
th
Can you compile a list of items to remove and I'll submit a PR? If
something needs to move somewhere I can include that too.
I'm updating the Eclipse files so I want to know what's relevant and what's
not.
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 3:05 AM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> The tests under tests/functional
The tests under tests/functional are legacy tests. Since they aren't
wired up to the build, it isn't surprising that they don't compile or
run. Some of the stuff under apps is likely in the same state. Anything
that isn't built or maintained is subject to bit-rot and should probably
be deleted
On Thu, 20 May 2021 07:18:28 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> The same failure was earlier fixed at PR #496, which seems insufficient.
> The changes in this PR were also tried ealier in the PR #496 but later
> removed, as they seemed not necessary.
> Fix is to clean up the test, by removing all chil
Hi,
I'm looking inside tests/functional and I see that this file
https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/blob/master/tests/functional/animation/javafx/animation/AnimationFunctionalTestBase.java
references com.sun.javafx.functions.Function0, but this class can't be
found. There is also a commented out sec
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:41:40 GMT, Martin Fox
wrote:
>> This PR adds code to ensure that KeyCodeCombinations match KeyEvents as
>> expected by more accurately mapping from a Mac key code to a Java key code
>> based on the user’s active keyboard layout (the existing code assumes a US
>> QWERTY
On Thu, 20 May 2021 17:23:56 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> The security manager is being deprecated for removal by [JEP
> 411](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/411), which is proposed for JDK 17. The
> implementation of JEP 411 is out for review here: openjdk/jdk#4073.
>
> Along with the deprecat
The security manager is being deprecated for removal by [JEP
411](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/411), which is proposed for JDK 17. The
implementation of JEP 411 is out for review here: openjdk/jdk#4073.
Along with the deprecation of most security manager classes and methods, the
default value
On Tue, 18 May 2021 13:11:39 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg
wrote:
>> Florian Kirmaier has updated the pull request incrementally with two
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - 8264127
>>fixed assertion text,
>>exception handler is now installed/uninstalled like in TableCel
On Thu, 20 May 2021 11:12:09 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> Fixing ListCell editing status is true, when index changes while editing.
>
> Florian Kirmaier has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> 8264127
> small changes based on
On Tue, 18 May 2021 10:14:11 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> Fixing ListCell editing status is true, when index changes while editing.
>
> Florian Kirmaier has updated the pull request incrementally with two
> additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - 8264127
>fixed assertion text
> Fixing ListCell editing status is true, when index changes while editing.
Florian Kirmaier has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8264127
small changes based on CR
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pul
On Wed, 19 May 2021 14:15:00 GMT, Marius Hanl
wrote:
>> ~~Note: I reported the bug already, waiting for approval. Internal tracking
>> id: 9070318. I will update the title as soon as the ticket is created.~~
>> EDIT: Changed the title. :)
>>
>> This PR is fixing a NP, which is thrown when you
Hi Tom,
can't say anything to your questions: being on win only and just
having Eclipse projects for base, graphics, controls (everything else
is handled by gradle from the commandline)
-- Jeanette
Zitat von Tom Schindl :
Hi Nir/Jeannette,
As you are both using Eclipse for development
The same failure was earlier fixed at PR #496, which seems insufficient.
The changes in this PR were also tried ealier in the PR #496 but later removed,
as they seemed not necessary.
Fix is to clean up the test, by removing all children added to root and hiding
the stage.
The test only fails on t
On Tue, 18 May 2021 10:14:11 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> Fixing ListCell editing status is true, when index changes while editing.
>
> Florian Kirmaier has updated the pull request incrementally with two
> additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - 8264127
>fixed assertion text
16 matches
Mail list logo
