I agree.
The availability of assertThrows and assertDoesNotThrows is already a
justification for jUnit 5, imho.
- Johan
Op za 25 sep. 2021 om 17:58 schreef Marius Hanl :
>I also really like this move, thanks for that.
>
>I have also experience with JUnit 5.
>And if there is something
I also really like this move, thanks for that.
I have also experience with JUnit 5.
And if there is something where I may can help I'm glad to do so.
For people who may don't know, this are the features JUnit5 gives
us and I'm also excited about:
- assertThrows(..)
- assertDo
> I've added JUnit 5 as a test dependency and made sure that the JUnit 4 tests
> still work. Also added a single JUnit 5 tests, and confirmed it works.
>
> I've updated the Eclipse project file for the base module only.
John Hendrikx has updated the pull request incrementally with one additiona
On Sat, 25 Sep 2021 13:13:03 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> The gradle verification task failed (see the test results from GitHub
> Actiona). It looks like it still needs the hamcrest jars. Go ahead and add
> them back in (and remove the exclusion for them).
Yeah, I noticed, I couldn't get rid
I also see advantages in moving to JUnit 5, given that we can still
support both JUint 4 and JUnit 5 in the same project using
jupiter-vintage (thus avoiding the need to rewrite existing tests).
Do any other contributors have experiences with JUnit 5 that they could
share?
-- Kevin
On 9/25
> I've added JUnit 5 as a test dependency and made sure that the JUnit 4 tests
> still work. Also added a single JUnit 5 tests, and confirmed it works.
>
> I've updated the Eclipse project file for the base module only.
John Hendrikx has updated the pull request incrementally with one additiona
On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 21:20:19 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> I've added JUnit 5 as a test dependency and made sure that the JUnit 4 tests
>> still work. Also added a single JUnit 5 tests, and confirmed it works.
>>
>> I've updated the Eclipse project file for the base module only.
>
> John Hendri
I much prefer JUnit 5 to 4, so I'm in favor.
On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 12:40 AM John Hendrikx wrote:
> Posting this to gauge the interest in adding JUnit 5 as a test
> dependency to JavaFX, enabling writing tests with this new version of
> JUnit while still supporting all JUnit 4 tests.
>
> A draf
