On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:59:34 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the proposal in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
>> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
>> good test coverage.
>>
>> This w
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:59:34 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the proposal in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
>> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
>> good test coverage.
>>
>> This w
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:59:34 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the proposal in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
>> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
>> good test coverage.
>>
>> This w
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:12:55 GMT, Tom Schindl wrote:
>> John Hendrikx has updated the pull request incrementally with five
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Reword flat map docs a bit and fixed a link
>> - Add missing javadoc tags
>> - Clean up docs in Subscription
>> -
On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 03:08:59 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> Both seem fine, I don't have any preference over one or the other.
>
> I struggled with finding a good description here
> [previously](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/675#discussion_r777801130).
> I think that mstr2 gave a good approach
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:01:01 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> I read this comment after what I wrote about `flatMap`, so mstr2 also had
>> the idea of "More precisely", which is good :)
>>
>> I would suggested something similar to what I did there:
>>
>>
>> Creates a new {@code ObservableValue} t
On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 03:28:01 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> Yeah, agreed, it is a bit annoying to have to deal with the fact that these
>> classes are wrappers around an actual value and having to refer to them as
>> such to be "precise". I'm willing to make another pass at all of these to
>> chan
> This is an implementation of the proposal in
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
> good test coverage.
>
> This was based on https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/434 but with a
> This is an implementation of the proposal in
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
> good test coverage.
>
> This was based on https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/434 but with a
On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 03:28:01 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> Yeah, agreed, it is a bit annoying to have to deal with the fact that these
>> classes are wrappers around an actual value and having to refer to them as
>> such to be "precise". I'm willing to make another pass at all of these to
>> chan
10 matches
Mail list logo
