Dear All,
when building a minimum JavaFX app [1] for Windows platform using
Gluon's maven plugin [2] incorporating GraalVM native image, the final exe
size is approx. 60 MB. It is quite large. I've been searching for the help
on StackOverflow [3], but there is no response for last 6 months. I am
On 2018-09-27 Sverre Moe wrote:
> Den tor. 27. sep. 2018 kl. 20:06 skrev Johan Vos :
>
> > > We would probably target the Java 11 because it is LTS. Changes to JDK
> > > will be backported up to september 2023 by the community. If we are
> > > interested in getting updates on OpenJFX also we
, 2018 at 8:02 PM Jan Tosovsky mailto:j.tosov...@email.cz> > wrote:
Dear All,
I made a small JavaFX app for small non-techie team working on Windows
(rewritten from Swing few years ago). Everyone had Java JRE installed so it
was enough to distribute small jar file (50 kB), which could be ex
Dear All,
I made a small JavaFX app for small non-techie team working on Windows
(rewritten from Swing few years ago). Everyone had Java JRE installed so it
was enough to distribute small jar file (50 kB), which could be executed on
double click. Lucky man.
I am quite confused by recent JavaFX
r 12, 2017 9:52 PM
> To: Jan Tosovsky
> Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: WebView and WebGL
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> I have to say that I find your question rather "curious"!
>
> Imagine asking a Qt developer "Why do you need 3D in Qt?&qu
On 2017-09-10 Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> 3D enhancement are indeed not planned for Java10 (at the minimum) ...
> but I agree with Mike - you can, maybe somewhat surprisingly, do quite
> a lot with what there is.
>
> ...
>
> We've employed some clever tricks to get adequate "advanced features"
>
