Well maybe mirror was the wrong term - I think now that 8u-dev is force
and won't see any changes anymore. A one time dump is what we should
have somewhere on git/github.
Tom
On 18.01.19 09:27, Tom Schindl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any documentation how the current javafxports mirror repository
Hi,
Is there any documentation how the current javafxports mirror repository
got created?
Some of our customer projects are going to be stuck on JavaFX-8 for the
forseeable future and while we won't sign up for providing general
support for JavaFX-8 it would be good to have a central place one ca
I'm not sure that an 8u-dev mirror would be suitable for the javafxports
project, but if someone wanted to set up such a mirror elsewhere they
could do so. It might be best left to the future maintainer (if any
suitable party steps forward) to determine whether and where to host a
git mirror.
This is a follow-up to the "heads-up" [0] email I sent before the New Year.
As has been previously announced [1][2], Oracle will no longer
contribute to the JDK 8 Updates Project after the January 2019 quarterly
CPU release of JDK 8u202. Since JavaFX for JDK 8 is delivered as a part
of the JDK
Hi,
Could we get a mirror of 8u setup for github as well? I wanted to ask
for that since some time but always forgot to do so.
Tom
On 21.12.18 22:32, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> As has been previously announced [1][2], Oracle will no longer
> contribute to the JDK 8 Updates Project after the Januar
As has been previously announced [1][2], Oracle will no longer
contribute to the JDK 8 Updates Project after the January 2019 quarterly
CPU release of JDK 8u202. Since JavaFX for JDK 8 is delivered as a part
of the JDK, Oracle will also no longer contribute to the OpenJFX 8u-dev
code line (8u-d