Btw, I filed the following Enhancement for deprecating GTK 2 for removal:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8273089
And I dug up the bug I had previously filed to remove the unused applet
implementation code:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201538
-- Kevin
On 8/27/2021 11:
Thanks. As a follow-on though, it seems possible that not having GTK 2
support might help in our efforts to support GTK 4 or Wayland, but maybe
that's wishful thinking on my part.
-- Kevin
On 8/27/2021 11:27 AM, Johan Vos wrote:
I agree with both suggestions (also with the Wayland one, but t
I agree with both suggestions (also with the Wayland one, but that indeed
belongs in a different thread -- I'm working on that one locally).
- Johan
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 7:07 PM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> Definitely agree with the first one. Getting rid of the vestigial applet
> code in the i
Definitely agree with the first one. Getting rid of the vestigial applet
code in the implementation would be good cleanup.
As for the second, I like the idea of deprecating the gtk2 support "for
removal" (it's not API, but conceptually it similar). Since gtk2 is no
longer supported by any Linu
I think having prototypes of both a Metal pipeline and native Wayland
would be good in the JavaFX 18 time frame.
We hope to have something to share on Metal in a month or so. The JavaFX
Metal pipeline can leverage some of the work done for Java2D in the
Lanai project.
I'll let Johan comment
