Re: [jfx15] RFR: 8249647: Many classes in package javafx.beans.binding in module javafx.base have implicit no-arg constructors [v3]

2020-07-28 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:00:37 GMT, Ajit Ghaisas wrote: >> Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8249647 >> Fix : Added missing explicit no-arg constructors to classes in package >> javafx.beans.binding in module javafx.base. > > Ajit Ghaisas has updated the pull request incrementally w

Re: [jfx15] RFR: 8249647: Many classes in package javafx.beans.binding in module javafx.base have implicit no-arg constructors [v3]

2020-07-28 Thread Nir Lisker
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:00:37 GMT, Ajit Ghaisas wrote: >> Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8249647 >> Fix : Added missing explicit no-arg constructors to classes in package >> javafx.beans.binding in module javafx.base. > > Ajit Ghaisas has updated the pull request incrementally w

Re: [jfx15] RFR: 8249647: Many classes in package javafx.beans.binding in module javafx.base have implicit no-arg constructors [v3]

2020-07-28 Thread Ajit Ghaisas
> Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8249647 > Fix : Added missing explicit no-arg constructors to classes in package > javafx.beans.binding in module javafx.base. Ajit Ghaisas has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: add @co

Re: [jfx15] RFR: 8249647: Many classes in package javafx.beans.binding in module javafx.base have implicit no-arg constructors [v2]

2020-07-27 Thread Ajit Ghaisas
> Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8249647 > Fix : Added missing explicit no-arg constructors to classes in package > javafx.beans.binding in module javafx.base. Ajit Ghaisas has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: review_

Re: [jfx15] RFR: 8249647: Many classes in package javafx.beans.binding in module javafx.base have implicit no-arg constructors

2020-07-27 Thread Ajit Ghaisas
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:16:07 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg wrote: > The single sentence of the min doc should end with a period, iirc ;) Thanks. Yes, I missed out on it.. will fix soon. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/275

Re: [jfx15] RFR: 8249647: Many classes in package javafx.beans.binding in module javafx.base have implicit no-arg constructors

2020-07-27 Thread Jeanette Winzenburg
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:07:31 GMT, Ajit Ghaisas wrote: > Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8249647 > Fix : Added missing explicit no-arg constructors to classes in package > javafx.beans.binding in module javafx.base. The single sentence of the min doc should end with a period, ii

[jfx15] RFR: 8249647: Many classes in package javafx.beans.binding in module javafx.base have implicit no-arg constructors

2020-07-27 Thread Ajit Ghaisas
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8249647 Fix : Added missing explicit no-arg constructors to classes in package javafx.beans.binding in module javafx.base. - Commit messages: - add explicit constructors Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/275/files Webre