Re: Ad suggested test unit for "JDK-8234959 FXMLLoader does not populate ENGINE_SCOPE Bindings with FILENAME and ARGV"

2020-02-26 Thread Kevin Rushforth
If you want a preliminary review of a WIP PR, then yes, announcing it here is fine. -- Kevin On 2/26/2020 7:53 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: After studying [1], not sure whether one is supposed to announce a WIP here or not, so in doubt also announcing the URL for the suggested test unit (par

Re: Ad suggested test unit for "JDK-8234959 FXMLLoader does not populate ENGINE_SCOPE Bindings with FILENAME and ARGV"

2020-02-26 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
After studying [1], not sure whether one is supposed to announce a WIP here or not, so in doubt also announcing the URL for the suggested test unit (part of the systemTests) for those interested in checking it out: .  To run the systemTests tests only one

Ad suggested test unit for "JDK-8234959 FXMLLoader does not populate ENGINE_SCOPE Bindings with FILENAME and ARGV"

2020-02-18 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
For creating a test unit to test whether [1] is present or not, it is necessary to have a Java script engine to test again. As discussed in a different thread it is not advisable to use any concrete, existing Java script engine that is not part of the JDK. Therefore it becomes necessary to come