Re: Innovation again

2017-12-18 Thread John-Val Rose
Thank you Pedro. I’ve admired your work for some time. Well, it seems we’re all singing the same song. The question is, who (if anyone) is listening? > On 19 Dec 2017, at 09:12, Pedro Duque Vieira > wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been with JavaFX since version 1, also have experience with Swing. >

Re: Innovation again

2017-12-18 Thread Pedro Duque Vieira
Hi, I've been with JavaFX since version 1, also have experience with Swing. Been on a number of JavaFX commercial projects, contributed to community projects like JFxtras, ControlsFX, worked on Scene Builder and also have some open source JavaFX projects of my own. Like others said I think buildi

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-15 Thread Michael Ennen
I am not trying to create an OpenJFX repository that is maintained to any degree But, in my work on the Robot API I also went ahead and created the necessary infrastructure to get OpenJFX building on Appveyor (Windows continuous integration) and Travis CI (both Linux and macOS continuious integrat

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-15 Thread Michael Paus
Hi, first of all I would like to say that I fully agree with everything that has been said so far in this thread and I am glad that someone is pushing this long overdue discussion. Please find my comments inline. Am 15.12.17 um 10:09 schrieb John-Val Rose: [...] This initiative/team/group sho

RE: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-15 Thread Jago Westmacott
lf Of Laurent Bourgès Sent: 15 December 2017 10:38 To: John-Val Rose Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Mailing Subject: Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes) Dear all, Chris mail motivated me to answer too. *** For *your* situation, what is JavaFX, how do you want it to evolve and what

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-15 Thread Laurent Bourgès
Dear all, Chris mail motivated me to answer too. *** For *your* situation, what is JavaFX, how do you want it to evolve and what does it mean to you? *** I am developping for 10 years scientific desktop apps with Java Swing (+ Java Web Start). As our users are mostly using linux & macOS, we on

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-15 Thread John-Val Rose
Thanks for that extensive and very insightful response Chris. Let me make something very clear, just in case people have the wrong idea: I am not here to complain, stir-up trouble or to criticise anyone. In fact, I greatly admire the JavaFX team at Oracle and what they are managing to achieve wit

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-14 Thread Chris Newland
Hi John, Here's my $0.02 on JavaFX as someone who's used it for over 4 years in the JITWatch project (https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/jitwatch) and also for fun with my DemoFX benchmarks (https://github.com/chriswhocodes/DemoFX). On the whole I think the API is very good. Event handling, layout,

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-12 Thread John-Val Rose
I posted this over a week ago: > I am willing to work with *anyone* (within Oracle or not) on the features that the community craves, > such as those I listed (and any others). Not just because “many hands make light work” but because > I don’t know everything (or even close) and I need the knowle

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-06 Thread Mario Torre
2017-12-06 9:40 GMT+01:00 John-Val Rose : > Yes, I obviously need to know if anything I work on or design is going to > be accepted or is even wanted by the community as a whole, and as early on > in the process as possible. Heck, if I had my way, JavaFX would be used to > build everything from fo

RE: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-06 Thread Markus KARG
: Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes) Yes, I obviously need to know if anything I work on or design is going to be accepted or is even wanted by the community as a whole, and as early on in the process as possible. Heck, if I had my way, JavaFX would be used to build everything from

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-06 Thread Paul Ray Russell
penjfx-dev-requ...@openjdk.java.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > openjfx-dev-ow...@openjdk.java.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of openjfx-dev digest..." > > > Today's T

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-06 Thread John-Val Rose
l enough to be accepted without. Somebody has to decide before filing > the JEP. > > -Markus > > > > From: Mario Torre [mailto:neugens.limasoftw...@gmail.com] > Sent: Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2017 09:11 > To: Markus KARG > Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: Innova

RE: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-06 Thread Markus KARG
-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes) I think Phil said that, the way to propose such changes is to file a Jep and discuss it here. Cheers, Mario On Wed 6. Dec 2017 at 09:07, Markus KARG wrote: I think what John actually asked for is whom to send

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-06 Thread Mario Torre
riginal Message- > From: openjfx-dev [mailto:openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf > Of Philip Race > Sent: Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2017 06:50 > To: John-Val Rose > Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes) > > There needs

RE: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-06 Thread Markus KARG
Subject: Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes) There needs to be a viable community that is not just Oracle to support you here .. I think everyone has come to be dependent on Oracle to "be there". But if there is a specific community need that Oracle doesn't see as essential, the

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-05 Thread John-Val Rose
Absolutely - there needs to be a viable community that is not just Oracle. So, is there one? If not, how do we build one? OK, so let me rephrase my earlier email: I am willing to work with *anyone* (within Oracle or not) on the features that the community craves, such as those I listed (and any

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-05 Thread Philip Race
There needs to be a viable community that is not just Oracle to support you here .. I think everyone has come to be dependent on Oracle to "be there". But if there is a specific community need that Oracle doesn't see as essential, then the community should help out. -phil. On 12/5/17, 9:27 PM

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-05 Thread John-Val Rose
Well, that’s all fine but you didn’t address the issue of working with someone within Oracle to get these innovations done. Sure, I could just toil away by myself but clearly it would be better all around if there was someone with much more extensive knowledge of JavaFX and its internals who wa

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-05 Thread Philip Race
I think looking at it as an Oracle-owned and controlled project maybe the first mistake here. Yes it was closed source and then Oracle controlled, but not any more, OCA requirements aside. It is not even a "java specification". It can be evolved at an API level without a JSR. The JEP process is

Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-05 Thread John-Val Rose
Phil et. al., Whilst I’m not going to be quite as “passionate” as some on this issue (although I do understand the frustration), I would like to point out again that this is indeed a huge gap and it is critical that it is filled ASAP. Obviously a solution where every word in a text document is