On 15.06.2016 07:36, Alexander Nyßen wrote:
Would it require he (as well as all GEF committers that worked on the mentioned
fixes) would have to sign the OCA as well?
If there are multiple authors to a contribution, then they all need to
have an OCA on file. If one or more contributions are d
In general, everyone who contributes code needs to assign joint
ownership to Oracle under the OCA. Dalibor would be the best one to
answer specific OCA questions.
As for time frame, the schedule is on the JDK 9 project page:
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/
Any bug can be fixed before "
Hi Kevin,
> Am 14.06.2016 um 23:00 schrieb Kevin Rushforth :
>
> Hi,
>
> As far as we know, FXCanvas is now usable in an OSGi context with JDK 9 +
> Jigsaw, so you should be able to test this with the latest JDK 9 early access
> build.
I will contact Tom Schindl w.r.t. this as he maintains t
Hi,
As far as we know, FXCanvas is now usable in an OSGi context with JDK 9
+ Jigsaw, so you should be able to test this with the latest JDK 9 early
access build.
You mentioned that the following bugs are critical for you:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8159227 (properly forward
c
The Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework (GEF) project as well as other Eclipse
project rely on the JavaFX-SWT-integration that is realized through FXCanvas.
We at GEF, however, do not use it out-of-the-box but have created a subclass
(http://git.eclipse.org/c/gef/org.eclipse.gef4.git/tree/org.ec
