I agree with this advice, too. The easiest way is to take the javafx
jmods and use 'jlink' to produce the JDK you need. If your application
is modularized, you can jlink your app into the java runtime image and
only pull in the modules you need.
If you have more advanced needs, I note that we
Hi Petr,
I agree with Johan, best way to distribute a JavaFX app is to bundle Java
with your app. Also, not everyone as Java installed. So if you distribute
just the jars so that people don't have to install anything, they might
have to end up having to install Java anyway.
Cheers,
--
Pedro Duq
Hi Petr
This issue is a real problem for anyone that needs to deploy JavaFX and
don't have the Webstart any more
I am working on this issue for my own applications, and even talked with
Johan about this, a few months ago
there some issues here that you need to take into your consideration
who are
From: Johan Vos
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 11:49 AM
To: Petr Nemecek
Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: JavaFX Deployment
Hi Petr,
Your questions are actually related. The recommended way for distributing
JavaFX apps is by bundling them with the required libraries, modules
Hi Petr,
Your questions are actually related. The recommended way for distributing
JavaFX apps is by bundling them with the required libraries, modules and VM
into an executable. That way, you determine whether your application works
with Java 8, 9, 10, 11 or beyond. You simply bundle the required
Hi all,
I'm a nebiew to JavaFX, currently rewriting our industrial Flex app into
JavaFX. So far so good (I like it!), it is just not clear to me, how to
deploy the app once the Java Web Start is gone and JavaFX will not be
bundled in Java itself.
Questions:
1) Is there something similar to Java W
Hi Dalibor,
thank you for your pointer, just posted an e-mail "Nashorn's
javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory
produces wrong code" together with a little Java utility that lists the
currently available
javax.script engines with their properties and tests for their factories, as
well as being able t
On 07.12.2016 20:04, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
P.P.S.: If anyone can point me at the trackers for the Java development kit's
"jrunscript.exe" (can
only run Nashorn scripts, running other script engines causes errors despite
documenting, that that
should be possible) and to the Nashorn bug trac
For scripting languages that possess javax.script (part of Java since Java
1.6/6!) implementations
the JavaFX infrastructure is of a great attractivity.
JavaFX would allow script programmers for creating platform independent GUIs to
take fully advantage
for their own purposes, i.e. "surfing on J
