It will be once we create a 9.0 repo and merge our sandbox with the
openjfx repo. Currently we have a working version of Recording/Capture
APIs with FXMediaRecorder demo (in apps) implemented on Windows.
Linux and Mac implementations are to be done.
So expect more to be coming soon.
Kirill.
O
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-33682
Kevin Rushforth wrote:
Regarding JMX:
Kevin, if it is easy to open it, lets just do it and use it as a starting point.
Should be pretty easy. I'll file a JIRA.
-- Kevin
Richard Bair wrote:
That's pretty much it. VP6, T2K, deploy, FX JMX
Regarding JMX:
Kevin, if it is easy to open it, lets just do it and use it as a starting point.
Should be pretty easy. I'll file a JIRA.
-- Kevin
Richard Bair wrote:
That's pretty much it. VP6, T2K, deploy, FX JMX tooling.
VP6 won't ever be opened because it is licensed 3rd part
Sweet! See you there.
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 5:25 PM, Sven Reimers wrote:
>
> Put me down as interested Richard. We can chat a bit on it at Devoxx
>
> Sven
>
> Am 19.10.2013 02:08 schrieb "Richard Bair" :
>> > That's pretty much it. VP6, T2K, deploy, FX JMX tooling.
>>
>> VP6 won't ever be op
We don't support it, and frankly there hasn't been any demand. I think along it
easier to plug in codecs and letting developers do this (vs having built in
support) is the way to go because shipping codecs with the platform (not app)
is fraught with legal headaches.
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 5:29 P
Does JavaFX support VP8 and, if not, when will it support it?
On 19 October 2013 11:16, Richard Bair wrote:
> > Is the fact that the VP6 decoder is not included because of a legal
> issue?
>
> Yes, we don't own the code (Google does!) so we can't release it. Google
> has opened VP8, the success
Put me down as interested Richard. We can chat a bit on it at Devoxx
Sven
Am 19.10.2013 02:08 schrieb "Richard Bair" :
> > That's pretty much it. VP6, T2K, deploy, FX JMX tooling.
>
> VP6 won't ever be opened because it is licensed 3rd party code. However it
> isn't used that much anymore, most
> Is the fact that the VP6 decoder is not included because of a legal issue?
Yes, we don't own the code (Google does!) so we can't release it. Google has
opened VP8, the successor to VP6, but not VP6.
Richard
> That's pretty much it. VP6, T2K, deploy, FX JMX tooling.
VP6 won't ever be opened because it is licensed 3rd party code. However it
isn't used that much anymore, most folks are using h.264. T2K I will come back
to. Deploy code (meaning, Applets) is not planned to be open sourced, and I
don't
t: Re: Media is now opensource
All of the JavaFX runtime is open source except for the third-party code that
we cannot ship (e.g., the On2 codec that Kirill mentioned, and the T2K font
library, for which we have an open replacement), and the FX deploy code, which
depends on the JRE deploy
This is really great news!
Is the fact that the VP6 decoder is not included because of a legal issue?
On 19 October 2013 10:39, Pedro Duque Vieira wrote:
> Thanks Kirill, good job.
>
> You guys had already a working prototype of an app that recorded audio and
> video. I wonder if this is also a
ng else?)
-Original Message-
From: openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net
[mailto:openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Kirill Kirichenko
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 9:35 AM
To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Media is now opensource
Hello OpenJFXers !
We're happy
Thanks Kirill, good job.
You guys had already a working prototype of an app that recorded audio and
video. I wonder if this is also available?
Thanks, best regards,
Hello OpenJFXers !
> We're happy to announce that Media part of JavaFX is now open source.
> Opensourcing touched all Media compon
October 18, 2013 9:35 AM
To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Media is now opensource
Hello OpenJFXers !
We're happy to announce that Media part of JavaFX is now open source.
Opensourcing touched all Media component except ON2 FLV demuxer and VP6
decoder. The decoder will remain clos
Great news!
What's the current state at this point? What is still missing?
Cheers,
Mario
Il 18/ott/2013 18:37 "Kirill Kirichenko" ha
scritto:
> Hello OpenJFXers !
> We're happy to announce that Media part of JavaFX is now open source.
> Opensourcing touched all Media component except ON2 FLV de
So that this consensus ends up going somewhere, who wants to make this happen?
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Martin Klähn wrote:
>
> +1
> Am 18.10.2013 20:55 schrieb "Scott Palmer" :
>
>> I propose the codecs be made pluggable. The licensing issue can be left
>> to the application developer.
+1
Am 18.10.2013 20:55 schrieb "Scott Palmer" :
> I propose the codecs be made pluggable. The licensing issue can be left
> to the application developer.
>
> https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-2684
>
> Once that is in place, support for whatever codec you wish can be added.
> FFMPEG could be
Absolutely the best option for the platform. If, before such a
mechanism is in place, interested parties have an option to do
something (even if it is a hack), that's a good thing anyway.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Scott Palmer wrote:
> I propose the codecs be made pluggable. The licensing
That sounds right to me.
On Oct 18, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Scott Palmer wrote:
> I propose the codecs be made pluggable. The licensing issue can be left to
> the application developer.
>
> https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-2684
>
> Once that is in place, support for whatever codec you wish
+1
Am 18.10.2013 um 20:53 schrieb Scott Palmer :
> I propose the codecs be made pluggable. The licensing issue can be left to
> the application developer.
>
> https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-2684
>
> Once that is in place, support for whatever codec you wish can be added.
> FFMPEG co
I propose the codecs be made pluggable. The licensing issue can be left to the
application developer.
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-2684
Once that is in place, support for whatever codec you wish can be added. FFMPEG
could be used as an example.
I'm against adding any new codecs with
Media is very regulated area in legal terms. Using different codecs may
involve using and even violating some license agreements.
Anyway you're welcome to propose anything.
On 18.10.2013 21:37, Robert Krüger wrote:
Great news!
Does this mean that it is now possible to add support for more
dem
Great news!
Does this mean that it is now possible to add support for more
demuxers/decoders e.g. by utilizing stuff from other projects (ffmpeg
comes to mind)?
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Kirill Kirichenko
wrote:
> Hello OpenJFXers !
> We're happy to announce that Media part of JavaFX is n
Very good job Kirill !
Olivier
- Mail original -
De: "Stephen F Northover"
À: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Envoyé: Vendredi 18 Octobre 2013 19:30:32
Objet: Re: Media is now opensource
This is huge! Thanks Kirill.
Steve
On 2013-10-18 12:35 PM, Kirill Kirichenko wrot
This is huge! Thanks Kirill.
Steve
On 2013-10-18 12:35 PM, Kirill Kirichenko wrote:
Hello OpenJFXers !
We're happy to announce that Media part of JavaFX is now open source.
Opensourcing touched all Media component except ON2 FLV demuxer and
VP6 decoder. The decoder will remain closed.
You'r
Thanks! This is great news!
Richard
On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:35 AM, Kirill Kirichenko
wrote:
> Hello OpenJFXers !
> We're happy to announce that Media part of JavaFX is now open source.
> Opensourcing touched all Media component except ON2 FLV demuxer and VP6
> decoder. The decoder will remain c
Spectacular, thanks for your work on this Kirill!
On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:35 AM, Kirill Kirichenko
wrote:
> Hello OpenJFXers !
> We're happy to announce that Media part of JavaFX is now open source.
> Opensourcing touched all Media component except ON2 FLV demuxer and VP6
> decoder. The decoder
Hello OpenJFXers !
We're happy to announce that Media part of JavaFX is now open source.
Opensourcing touched all Media component except ON2 FLV demuxer and VP6
decoder. The decoder will remain closed.
You're all welcome to contribute.
Thanks,
K
28 matches
Mail list logo
