On 14.05.2015 23:53, Tom Eugelink wrote:
But I did expect someone to respond on the handing in of the
JEP, mainly based on quotes like this: "/We use the current JEP Process
to collect, review, sort, and evaluate proposals for enhancements to the
JDK. The ongoing result of this process is the JDK
Sorry it took me a while to respond, I had a talk to prepare for.
On 28-4-2015 08:22, Mario Torre wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 09:52 +0200, Tom Eugelink wrote:
Totally off topic, I apologise, but the subscribers to this list are the type
of people who may have the experience I seek.
I've been
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 09:52 +0200, Tom Eugelink wrote:
> Totally off topic, I apologise, but the subscribers to this list are the type
> of people who may have the experience I seek.
>
> I've been trying to pitch the concept of named parameters for Java 9, but
> somehow my JEP is never picked up
I don't know about JEP submission process, but you'd first have to solve
the problem that when Java added serialization of parameter names to class
files in Java 8, the OpenJDK devs explicitly decided *not* to expose them
for the JDK itself, on the grounds that they didn't want parameter names to
b
Totally off topic, I apologise, but the subscribers to this list are the type
of people who may have the experience I seek.
I've been trying to pitch the concept of named parameters for Java 9, but
somehow my JEP is never picked up. I emailed it in twice. Has anyone ever
successfully handed in
