Re: QML vs. FXML

2015-03-05 Thread Tom Schindl
Hi, First of all by default FXGraph "compiles" to FXML, that's also the reason why we currently don't allow you to write event-handlers inside the FXGraph file (from a technical point of view there's no reason why we should not be able to do that) but that would render us incompatible with FXML.

Re: QML vs. FXML

2015-03-05 Thread Hervé Girod
etty popular… > > Doug. > > From: "ngalarn...@abinitio.com<mailto:ngalarn...@abinitio.com>" > mailto:ngalarn...@abinitio.com>> > Date: Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 10:08 AM > To: Doug Schaefer mailto:dschae...@qnx.com>> > Cc: "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java

Re: QML vs. FXML

2015-03-05 Thread Benjamin Gudehus
>Now, having said that, HTML seems to be pretty popular… Some folks found even HTML too cumbersome to write and edit, and built transpilers [1], [2], [3], [4]. They look a bit like QML. [1] http://jade-lang.com/ [2] http://emblemjs.com/ [3] http://haml.info/ [4] http://slim-lang.com/ --Benjamin

Re: QML vs. FXML

2015-03-05 Thread Doug Schaefer
Yes :). Tom has dome some great work supporting JavaFX in the community. Now, I think you still need to compile FXGraph to something. The important requirement for declarative UI is the quick edit/reload cycle. Having the ³compiler² in the run-time would be needed for that, which is what QML, and

Re: QML vs. FXML

2015-03-05 Thread ngalarneau
Or GroovyFX From: Werner Lehmann To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net, Date: 03/05/2015 10:56 AM Subject:Re: QML vs. FXML Sent by:"openjfx-dev" Like this? http://wiki.eclipse.org/Efxclipse/Tooling/FXGraph On 05.03.2015 16:23, Doug Schaefer wrote: > You r

Re: QML vs. FXML

2015-03-05 Thread Werner Lehmann
Like this? http://wiki.eclipse.org/Efxclipse/Tooling/FXGraph On 05.03.2015 16:23, Doug Schaefer wrote: You really want to use a domain specific language that’s easy to read and write. QML is that. I find XML tags overwhelm the rest of the text making it hard to understand what’s going on, and h

Re: QML vs. FXML

2015-03-05 Thread Doug Schaefer
alarn...@abinitio.com<mailto:ngalarn...@abinitio.com>" mailto:ngalarn...@abinitio.com>> Date: Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 10:08 AM To: Doug Schaefer mailto:dschae...@qnx.com>> Cc: "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net<mailto:openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net>" mailto:op

QML vs. FXML

2015-03-05 Thread ngalarneau
Doug, You said: "good declarative UI language, think QML not FXML". What do you see as the advantages of QML over FXML? Neil From: Doug Schaefer To: "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net" , Date: 03/05/2015 10:00 AM Subject:Re: 8u40 is released / SB Sent by:"openjfx-dev"