t; From: openjfx-dev [mailto:openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf
> Of Herve Girod
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 8:20 AM
> To: Pedro Duque Vieira
> Cc: OpenJFX Mailing List
> Subject: Re: JavaFX at JavaOne 2014
>
> There are no reasons that JavaFX could not work well on mobile
when an app is
installed on the device.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Palmer [mailto:swpal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 5:46 PM
To: John Smith
Cc: Herve Girod; Pedro Duque Vieira; OpenJFX Mailing List
Subject: Re: JavaFX at JavaOne 2014
That first article was so wrong about
That first article was so wrong about nearly everything mentioned in it that it
made me want to vomit.
On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:31 PM, John Smith wrote:
> I don't know much about Android, but does it have to be a VM, or could you
> use ART or an ART equivalent:
>
> http://www.extremetech.com/c
alvik/art.html
John
-Original Message-
From: openjfx-dev [mailto:openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of
Herve Girod
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 8:20 AM
To: Pedro Duque Vieira
Cc: OpenJFX Mailing List
Subject: Re: JavaFX at JavaOne 2014
There are no reasons that JavaFX could not work
>
> There are no reasons that JavaFX could not work well on mobile platforms,
> providing there is a JVM. I was convinced that mobile UI toolkits were very
> specific, but it's really not the case. Android UI Toolkit has really very
> few mobile specificities for example.
>
It's not so much the to
Is it wrong to ask who makes this decision at Oracle? What person, persons or
Star Chamber decides to dedicate resources to say graphing or 3D instead of iOS
and Android?
What gets you laughed at and discredited for suggesting JFX to a boss or
customer is definitely the lack of a mobile "story"
There are no reasons that JavaFX could not work well on mobile platforms,
providing there is a JVM. I was convinced that mobile UI toolkits were very
specific, but it's really not the case. Android UI Toolkit has really very
few mobile specificities for example.
2014-06-23 16:46 GMT+02:00 Pedro D
>
> People have tried HTML5 as a way to create apps for mobile platforms. Most
> of the big names who tried this e.g. Facebook have abandoned it.
They've abandoned it but not because of the reasons you imply but rather
due to HTML5 limitations of providing a good native experience in regards
to pe
Community members such as Gerrit Grunwald have already demonstrated an
application with a single JavaFX code base running on Windows, MacOS,
Linux, Android, iOS and even Raspberry Pi.
BTW, I totally disagree with you on your comments about the similarities of
the desktop UIs and some sort of uniqu
>
> If it is correct that JavaFX won't be supporting iOS or Android
> (officially), IMO JavaFX will start fading away as soon as there is a
> reliable technology that can create apps for all platforms.
People have tried HTML5 as a way to create apps for mobile platforms. Most
of the big names who
Let's be a little bit more positive here guys...
>From the link I posted you can see that there is a ton of JavaFX content at
JavaOne this year which is a very. very good sign in itself.
And, as I said, both iOS and Android are mentioned with featured sessions.
This is *new* in the sense that th
Don't expect anything from Oracle related to IOS and Android other than
some code contributions. They have said
ADF Mobile / Jdeveloper (etc) will suffer financially if Oracle supports
IOS and Android directly.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Pedro Duque Vieira <
pedro.duquevie...@gmail.com> wro
Unfortunately there's nothing new and no Oracle sessions on that subject -
javafx on ios and/or android...
:(
--
Pedro Duque Vieira
Gosh, that formatted badly.
Here's a link to the actual list:
https://oracleus.activeevents.com/2014/connect/search.ww?eventRef=javaone#loadSearch-event=null&searchPhrase=JavaOne%2C+JavaFX&searchType=session&tc=0&sortBy=&p=&i(10009)=10111
On 19 June 2014 20:09, Felix Bembrick wrote:
> There'
14 matches
Mail list logo
