On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:07:11 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>> Jose Pereda has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Apply fix to snapPortionXX methods, extend test.
>
> Looks good now.
Please go ahead and integrate with the current
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:56:28 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
>> As discussed in the [JBS
>> issue](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199592), when snapping an
>> already snapped value (either intentionally or by mistake), the result
>> should be the same, otherwise we'll be jumping
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:56:28 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
>> As discussed in the [JBS
>> issue](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199592), when snapping an
>> already snapped value (either intentionally or by mistake), the result
>> should be the same, otherwise we'll be jumping
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:56:28 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
>> As discussed in the [JBS
>> issue](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199592), when snapping an
>> already snapped value (either intentionally or by mistake), the result
>> should be the same, otherwise we'll be jumping
> As discussed in the [JBS
> issue](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199592), when snapping an
> already snapped value (either intentionally or by mistake), the result
> should be the same, otherwise we'll be jumping unnecessary from a valid pixel
> to another pixel.
>
> This PR
