Re: Scene Builder performance regression between 1.1 and 2.0

Hi Felix, No, I don't see any particular reason for this... Could you please fill a Jira and attach this FXML file to it ? Thanks Jerome On 11/15/13 12:07 AM, Felix Bembrick wrote: Well I have discovered something that I really don't understand. It turns out that when I create *new* FXML file

Re: Scene Builder performance regression between 1.1 and 2.0

Well I have discovered something that I really don't understand. It turns out that when I create *new* FXML files with SB 2.0 I do not see any performance issues. In fact, the issues I was experiencing only occurred when I opened one particular existing FXML I have been working on. Further, afte

Re: Scene Builder performance regression between 1.1 and 2.0

On my Ubuntu 13.10 x64, I don't see this menu issue. I suspect a driver issue. Jerome On 11/7/13 6:33 PM, Philipp Dörfler wrote: I also noticed a performance regression (Linux x64). SceneBuilder 1.1 was already kind of slow, but 2.0 feels even less snappy. The menus feel particularly sluggish a

Re: Scene Builder performance regression between 1.1 and 2.0

Curiously it seems to only be a significant problem on one particular machine although it does run slower on all our Windows machines so it may well be a driver related issue. The problematic machine has an Nvidia Quadro FX5800. I will check for a driver update and report back on the subsequent

Re: Scene Builder performance regression between 1.1 and 2.0

It seems ok for me so far on windows. Here is what I see in the about dialog: Product Version JavaFX Scene Builder 2.0 (Developer Preview) Build Information Version: 2.0-b05, Changeset: ae16937fb015 Date: 2013-10-24 10:43 JavaFX Toolkit = QuantumToolkit Pipeline = D3DPipeline Hardware accelerati

Re: Scene Builder performance regression between 1.1 and 2.0

I also noticed a performance regression (Linux x64). SceneBuilder 1.1 was already kind of slow, but 2.0 feels even less snappy. The menus feel particularly sluggish and I can even see parts of the GPU's memory content right before the menu items are being drawn over it. Am 07.11.2013 12:49 schrieb

Re: Scene Builder performance regression between 1.1 and 2.0

On 11/7/2013 10:11 AM, Felix Bembrick wrote: Scene Builder 2.0 has very serious performance issues (on my machines at least). When running 1.1 & 2.0 side-by-side, 1.1 is very responsive and behaves very well. On the contrary, 2.0 is extremely sluggish with a few seconds between clicking on a c

Re: Scene Builder performance regression between 1.1 and 2.0

Hi, No performance issue for me, I'm also using Win7 64bits. I have similar (good) performance than SB 1.1. I had an issue on Ubuntu, and had to upgrade my Nvidia driver. Could you try to run SB 2 on a different machine ? Jerome On 11/7/13 7:11 AM, Felix Bembrick wrote: Scene Builder 2.0 has

Re: Scene Builder performance regression between 1.1 and 2.0

Hi Yves, Here are the details from About: It really performs much, much worse than 1.1 Felix *Product Version* *JavaFX Scene Builder 2.0 (Developer Preview)* *Build Information* *Version: 2.0-b05, Changeset: ae16937fb015* *Date: 2013-10-24 10:43* *JavaFX* *Toolkit = QuantumToolkit* *Pipeline

Re: Scene Builder performance regression between 1.1 and 2.0

Hi Felix, I didn't notice such an issue. Can you please log a JIRA so that we can track the details ? By the way what reads Help > About Scene Builder window, especially for JavaFX section, in the two cases (Toolkit, Pipeline, Hardware acceleration)

Scene Builder performance regression between 1.1 and 2.0

Scene Builder 2.0 has very serious performance issues (on my machines at least). When running 1.1 & 2.0 side-by-side, 1.1 is very responsive and behaves very well. On the contrary, 2.0 is extremely sluggish with a few seconds between clicking on a control and the selection handles appearing and t