On Tue, 10 May 2022 12:56:53 GMT, Thiago Milczarek Sayao
wrote:
>> When there's an APPLICATION_MODAL window, all other windows are disabled and
>> re-enabled when the APPLICATION_MODAL window closes. This causes
>> `requestToFront()` to be called on every window, and it does not guarantee
>>
On Wed, 25 May 2022 07:37:38 GMT, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
> keep dpqs for corner cases and keep my coding life simple
I think this approach is fine. Diverging the code would likely make it less
stable, and you answered the question about the provenance of the code, so
there's no issue there.
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:46:40 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the proposal in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
>> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
>> good test coverage.
>>
>> This
On Fri, 27 May 2022 16:47:04 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
On Fri, 27 May 2022 12:13:43 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
On Thu, 26 May 2022 07:26:38 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
On Tue, 24 May 2022 15:20:01 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Jay Bhaskar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Adding JGObject in plave of raw jni object
>
> modules/javafx.web/src/t
On Sun, 22 May 2022 14:06:41 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
On Wed, 25 May 2022 10:10:08 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:46:40 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the proposal in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
>> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
>> good test coverage.
>>
>> This
On Tue, 24 May 2022 17:34:25 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx17u`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 1835d1f5
Author: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/commit/1835d1f59104136d6cb34090bd69091433ddac00
Stats: 5
On Tue, 24 May 2022 17:33:57 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx17u`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 7b1637f8
Author: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/commit/7b1637f8f617639ddc0c93e15589824c6a0d71b1
Stats: 21
On Tue, 24 May 2022 17:31:58 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx11u`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: f89a5139
Author: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/commit/f89a513980c2c2637c4f3d2b80f0708fd6f9e252
Stats: 5
Clean backport to `jfx11u`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8283869: Update attribution in webkit.md file
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/102/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx11u=102=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8283869
Clean backport to `jfx11u`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8286256: Update libxml2 to 2.9.14
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/101/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx11u=101=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286256
Stats: 21664
On Tue, 24 May 2022 17:31:27 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx11u`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 8504dad2
Author: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/commit/8504dad26ac0f0dcbf7cb62ac58642dc8a91f02e
Stats: 21
Clean backport to `jfx17u`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8283869: Update attribution in webkit.md file
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/62/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx17u=62=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8283869
Stats:
Clean backport to `jfx17u`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8286256: Update libxml2 to 2.9.14
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/61/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx17u=61=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286256
Stats: 21664 lines
On Sun, 22 May 2022 14:06:41 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
On Thu, 19 May 2022 22:01:31 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Jay Bhaskar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Platform.exit() , removing code block, as it is causing other test fail
>
> modules
On Thu, 19 May 2022 15:57:46 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
On Thu, 19 May 2022 13:13:01 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
> Issue
> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>
> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
> 2. When
On Thu, 19 May 2022 12:44:44 GMT, Paweł Kruszczyński
wrote:
> `Stage` minimalizing (iconified state) cannot be disabled for the user. The
> same for `Stage` closable state.
> PR adds these features without breaking backward compatibility.
Marking this as "Draft" since it is not ready for
On Thu, 19 May 2022 12:44:44 GMT, Paweł Kruszczyński
wrote:
> `Stage` minimalizing (iconified state) cannot be disabled for the user. The
> same for `Stage` closable state.
> PR adds these features without breaking backward compatibility.
@xardif It is premature to review this PR. Please read
On Tue, 17 May 2022 13:08:10 GMT, Tomator wrote:
> Hello,i have signed oca ,and pull /signed command ,so I'm just wait for OCA
> to pass？
Yes, at this point you wait for your OCA to be processed.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/795
On Fri, 13 May 2022 12:21:32 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> * Submit a bug report with a test case at
> [bugreport.java.com](https://bugreport.java.com/)
I see that you already have submitted a bug report. You should get an email
when it is made public.
-
PR:
On Fri, 13 May 2022 05:36:03 GMT, Tomator wrote:
>> When I used BlueJ, I found a problem with Chinese display.
>> /javafx.graphics/com/sun/javafx/font/CompositeGlyphMapper.java#getGlyphCode
>> may return a negative number when no font library is specified in Linux,and
>> this could cause
On Wed, 18 May 2022 13:39:12 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
>> Updated libxml to version 2.9.14.As mentioned in UPDATING.txt, configured
>> for windows , linux and Mac platforms and updated the files accordingly.
>>
>> Updated libxslt to version 1.1.35. Generated the config.h files for windows
On Wed, 18 May 2022 07:26:56 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
>> Updated libxml to version 2.9.14.As mentioned in UPDATING.txt, configured
>> for windows , linux and Mac platforms and updated the files accordingly.
>>
>> Updated libxslt to version 1.1.35. Generated the config.h files for windows
On Tue, 17 May 2022 17:25:16 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Hima Bindu Meda has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add UPDATING.txt for libxslt update
>
> modules/javafx.web/src/main/native/S
On Wed, 18 May 2022 07:26:56 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
>> Updated libxml to version 2.9.14.As mentioned in UPDATING.txt, configured
>> for windows , linux and Mac platforms and updated the files accordingly.
>>
>> Updated libxslt to version 1.1.35. Generated the config.h files for windows
Hi Davide,
Are you referring to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268657 ?
I just tried it again, and it works fine for me.
-- Kevin
On 5/18/2022 4:12 AM, Davide Perini wrote:
Hi all,
someone else opened an issue in past on this problem.
I have the exact same problem:
On Tue, 17 May 2022 17:06:51 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
>> Updated libxml to version 2.9.14.As mentioned in UPDATING.txt, configured
>> for windows , linux and Mac platforms and updated the files accordingly.
>>
>> Updated libxslt to version 1.1.35. Generated the config.h files for windows
On Thu, 5 May 2022 16:21:45 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
> This PR fixes an issue with selection of multiple items in TableView and
> TreeTableView controls that gets moved unexpectedly when new items are added
> even way below the selected items.
>
> A couple of tests have been added. They fail
On Fri, 13 May 2022 08:28:50 GMT, Marius Hanl wrote:
>> A common reason for using the `TextFormatter` is the need for a `filter`.
>> Therefore, the following constructor is typically used:
>> `public TextFormatter(@NamedArg("filter") UnaryOperator filter) {
>> ... }`
>>
>> With that, no
On Sun, 8 May 2022 06:31:49 GMT, Paul wrote:
>> I hit on JDK-8181084 while making some changes to Scene Builder, so I
>> decided to investigate.
>>
>> Please note: I have not done any Objective-C or MacOS development before. So
>> I would really like some feedback from someone else who knows
On Tue, 10 May 2022 20:03:08 GMT, Marius Hanl wrote:
> A common reason for using the `TextFormatter` is the need for a `filter`.
> Therefore, the following constructor is typically used:
> `public TextFormatter(@NamedArg("filter") UnaryOperator filter) { ...
> }`
>
> With that, no
On Mon, 9 May 2022 21:07:39 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Almost clean backport to `jfx17u`. Tested in connection with libffi update in
> the `test-kcr-17.0.4` branch.
>
> The only difference from the mainline patch is that the following file is not
> present in `jfx17u
On Mon, 9 May 2022 21:05:17 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx17u`. Tested in connection with gstreamer / glib update
> in the `test-kcr-17.0.4` branch.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 1c376ebd
Author: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
GStreamer is used by the JavaFX media API. It is an implementation
detail, and is not exposed. There are no media capture APIs, although
that is something we have considered providing in the future.
-- Kevin
On 5/10/2022 1:02 PM, Davide Perini wrote:
Hi all,
I haven't understood what part
On Tue, 10 May 2022 16:37:57 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Doc-only change to update the license attribution in our `webkit.md` file.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 7bb48194
Author: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/com
Doc-only change to update the license attribution in our `webkit.md` file.
-
Commit messages:
- 8283869: Update attribution in webkit.md file
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/793/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx=793=00
Issue:
On Mon, 9 May 2022 21:07:39 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Almost clean backport to `jfx17u`. Tested in connection with libffi update in
> the `test-kcr-17.0.4` branch.
>
> The only difference from the mainline patch is that the following file is not
> present in `jfx17u
On Mon, 9 May 2022 21:20:29 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This PR is dependent on #58 so it is in Draft for now. Once #58 is
> integrated, I will rebase this and submit it, at which time it will be a
> clean backport, and the diffs will only show the updated test and build
This PR is dependent on #58 so it is in Draft for now. Once #58 is integrated,
I will rebase this and submit it, at which time it will be a clean backport,
and the diffs will only show the updated test and build changes associated with
just this fix.
-
Commit messages:
- 8280275:
On Mon, 9 May 2022 21:14:23 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx17u`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: be207ddb
Author: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/commit/be207ddb7249b369a028bc6fb6985adda7841648
Stats: 227 li
On Mon, 9 May 2022 21:22:04 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx17u` so we can build on macOS / aarch64 without needing
> to specify `-PCOMPILE_TARGET=arm64`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: a5edae13
Author: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
On Mon, 9 May 2022 21:15:34 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx17u`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: bdb8d28e
Author: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/commit/bdb8d28ecc7bb10278a9a8385da79b5f5652bb09
Stats: 84 li
On Mon, 9 May 2022 21:18:07 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx17u`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 2ab0e82e
Author: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/commit/2ab0e82ee9cf2516b32914e2df4725becf8a2664
Stats: 161 li
On Mon, 9 May 2022 21:13:07 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx17u`. Tested along with the rest of the fixes in the
> `test-kcr-17.0.4` branch.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 684c80fc
Author: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.ja
Here is the proposed schedule for JavaFX 19.
RDP1: Jul 14, 2022 (aka “feature freeze”)
RDP2: Aug 4, 2022
Freeze: Aug 25, 2022
GA: Sep 13, 2022
We plan to fork a jfx19 stabilization branch at RDP1. The GA date is one
week ahead of JDK 19, matching what we did for 18.
The start of RDP1, the
Clean backport to `jfx17u` so we can build on macOS / aarch64 without needing
to specify `-PCOMPILE_TARGET=arm64`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8276174: JavaFX build fails on macOS aarch64
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/60/files
Webrev:
Clean backport to `jfx17u`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8274274: Update JUnit to version 5.8.1
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/58/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx17u=58=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274274
Stats: 161
Clean backport to `jfx17u`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8273998: Clarify specification for Window properties controlled by the
window manager
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/57/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx17u=57=00
Issue:
Clean backport to `jfx17u`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8276142: Update gradle to version 7.3
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/56/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx17u=56=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8276142
Stats: 227
On Mon, 9 May 2022 21:15:57 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Reviewer: @arapte
Since this is clean, a review is optional.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/55
Clean backport to `jfx17u`. Tested along with the rest of the fixes in the
`test-kcr-17.0.4` branch.
-
Commit messages:
- 8281564: Update cmake to 3.22.3
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/55/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx17u=55=00
On Mon, 9 May 2022 21:13:07 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx17u`. Tested along with the rest of the fixes in the
> `test-kcr-17.0.4` branch.
Reviewer: @arapte
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/55
Almost clean backport to `jfx17u`. Tested in connection with libffi update in
the `test-kcr-17.0.4` branch.
The only difference from the mainline patch is that the following file is not
present in `jfx17u`, so that part of the patch was skipped:
Clean backport to `jfx17u`. Tested in connection with gstreamer / glib update
in the `test-kcr-17.0.4` branch.
-
Commit messages:
- 8280840: Update libFFI to 3.4.2
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/53/files
Webrev:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:28:34 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> Update the the test utility. Includes:
>> * Refactoring since there is no more need the split pre- and
>> post-attenuation and light types.
>> * Added customizable material to the `Boxes` to test the interaction between
>> lights and
On Wed, 4 May 2022 16:55:30 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
>> This PR updates the screen for each window even for the case where the old
>> screen has been disposed but there is a new screen instance found for such
>> window.
>>
>> This is the case of Android, where the lifecycle of the application
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 22:38:13 GMT, Alexander Matveev
wrote:
> Fixed by removing check which enables dynamic format change, since it
> requires for portrait videos, not standard resolutions and anything that has
> width > 1920 or/and height > 1080.
Looks good. I confirm that it fixes the
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 18:26:06 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
> This PR updates the screen for each window even for the case where the old
> screen has been disposed but there is a new screen instance found for such
> window.
>
> This is the case of Android, where the lifecycle of the application
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:48:01 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This PR is dependent on #97 so it is in Draft for now. Once #97 is
> integrated, I will rebase this and submit it, at which time it will be a
> clean backport, and the diffs will only show the updated test.
This pull reques
This PR is dependent on #97 so it is in Draft for now. Once #97 is integrated,
I will rebase this and submit it, at which time it will be a clean backport,
and the diffs will only show the updated test.
-
Commit messages:
- 8280275: JUnit5 tests using Assumptions API fail to
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:51:23 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Backport to `jfx11u` so we can build on macOS / aarch64 without needing to
> specify `-PCOMPILE_TARGET=arm64`. It isn't a clean backport, since I also had
> to include the definition of `IS_AARCH64` which is present in
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:30:49 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx11u`. Tested in connection with gstreamer / glib update
> in the `test-kcr-11.0.16` branch.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 1e4862f4
Author: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:37:08 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Backport to `jfx11u`. Tested in connection with libffi update in the
> `test-kcr-11.0.16` branch.
>
> This was not a clean backport, but the merge conflicts were trivial to
> resolve. Here is a summary of the changes. T
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:45:39 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Nearly clean backport to `jfx11u`. It isn't a clean backport since the
> mainline patch updated `gradle/verification-metadata.xml`, which doesn't
> exist in 11.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 44e691
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:39:32 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Simple backport to `jfx11u`. It isn't a clean backport since the mainline
> patch had an update to `gradle/verification-metadata.xml`, which doesn't
> exist in 11.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: e877f3
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:43:09 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx11u`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: e92f7fcd
Author: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/commit/e92f7fcd4f9e9bc89c91b06b1c7fa8296c4902bb
Stats: 227 li
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:48:57 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx11u`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 1e62db92
Author: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/commit/1e62db92944c545cc7dd333652819be1c50896ff
Stats: 84 li
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:51:23 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Backport to `jfx11u` so we can build on macOS / aarch64 without needing to
> specify `-PCOMPILE_TARGET=arm64`. It isn't a clean backport, since I also had
> to include the definition of `IS_AARCH64` which is present in
Backport to `jfx11u` so we can build on macOS / aarch64 without needing to
specify `-PCOMPILE_TARGET=arm64`. It isn't a clean backport, since I also had
to include the definition of `IS_AARCH64` which is present in mainline, but not
in `jfx11u` (it was added as part of another unrelated fix
Clean backport to `jfx11u`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8273998: Clarify specification for Window properties controlled by the
window manager
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/99/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx11u=99=00
Issue:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:45:39 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Nearly clean backport to `jfx11u`. It isn't a clean backport since the
> mainline patch updated `gradle/verification-metadata.xml`, which doesn't
> exist in 11.
Reviewer: @arapte
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.n
Nearly clean backport to `jfx11u`. It isn't a clean backport since the mainline
patch updated `gradle/verification-metadata.xml`, which doesn't exist in 11.
-
Commit messages:
- 8274274: Update JUnit to version 5.8.1
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/97/files
Clean backport to `jfx11u`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8276142: Update gradle to version 7.3
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/96/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx11u=96=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8276142
Stats: 227
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:39:32 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Simple backport to `jfx11u`. It isn't a clean backport since the mainline
> patch had an update to `gradle/verification-metadata.xml`, which doesn't
> exist in 11.
Reviewer: @arapte
-
PR: https://git.openjdk
Simple backport to `jfx11u`. It isn't a clean backport since the mainline patch
had an update to `gradle/verification-metadata.xml`, which doesn't exist in 11.
-
Commit messages:
- 8281564: Update cmake to 3.22.3
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/95/files
Webrev:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:37:08 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Backport to `jfx11u`. Tested in connection with libffi update in the
> `test-kcr-11.0.16` branch.
>
> This was not a clean backport, but the merge conflicts were trivial to
> resolve. Here is a summary of the changes. T
Backport to `jfx11u`. Tested in connection with libffi update in the
`test-kcr-11.0.16` branch.
This was not a clean backport, but the merge conflicts were trivial to resolve.
Here is a summary of the changes. The jfx mainline patch applied cleanly to all
other files.
1. The following file is
Clean backport to `jfx11u`. Tested in connection with gstreamer / glib update
in the `test-kcr-11.0.16` branch.
-
Commit messages:
- 8280840: Update libFFI to 3.4.2
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/93/files
Webrev:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:01:06 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
> Updated the README link to match the CONTRIBUTING link.
Looks good. Thanks for fixing it.
-
Marked as reviewed by kcr (Lead).
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/788
Yes, this seems like a bug. I agree that it would be better for the
"issues list" link to use the same filtered list of issues that
CONTRIBUTING.md links to.
-- Kevin
On 4/26/2022 8:54 PM, Nir Lisker wrote:
In the README.md, under Issue Tracking, the link to "issues list" leads to
the JBS
As you note, there are a few different issues here. To answer your
questions as best I can:
1 & 3. We should document that self-illum maps and specular only use the
rgb components and that alpha should be ignored. It's possible (although
I don't know for sure) that the image is being treated
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 06:50:07 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal wrote:
> Add release notes for JavaFX 18.0.1 to the repository
Marked as reviewed by kcr (Lead).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/785
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 06:50:07 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal wrote:
> Add release notes for JavaFX 18.0.1 to the repository
The following two non-public (security) fixes are also included in 18.0.1:
JDK-8276371 (not public) | Better long buffering | web
JDK-8277465 (not public) | Additional fix for
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 19:26:36 GMT, Thiago Milczarek Sayao
wrote:
> When there's an APPLICATION_MODAL window, all other windows are disabled and
> re-enabled when the APPLICATION_MODAL window closes. This causes
> `requestToFront()` to be called on every window, and it does not guarantee
>
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 08:37:11 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
>> This PR fixes
>> JDK-[8193442](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193442), but also
>> [JDK-8187596](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187596), and
>> verifies that the tests mentioned in
>>
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:03:04 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
> This PR is to remove calls to deprecated method System.runFinalization.
> Here is the list of module wise test cases affected by the removal:
>
> **web**:
> test.javafx.scene.web.LeakTest
>
> **systemTests**:
>
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:07:38 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> This is a test only fix. The tests used to create Sphere and Cylinder of
> large divisions, which could fail intermittently with OOM.
> The tests were added along with the fix for
>
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:44:57 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> The test ServiceTest.testManyServicesRunConcurrently fails intermittently on
> Windows platform with a time out error.
> Test needs to be skipped until fixed.
LGTM
-
Marked as reviewed by kcr (Lead).
PR:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 23:08:00 GMT, Alexander Matveev
wrote:
>> - GStreamer updated to 1.20.1 and GLib updated to 2.72.0.
>> - No changes to our code, except in GstAudioSpectrum.cpp
>> g_atomic_pointer_compare_and_exchange() was changed to
>> g_atomic_pointer_set(). For some reason I was not
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:38:03 GMT, Alexander Matveev
wrote:
>> - GStreamer updated to 1.20.1 and GLib updated to 2.72.0.
>> - No changes to our code, except in GstAudioSpectrum.cpp
>> g_atomic_pointer_compare_and_exchange() was changed to
>> g_atomic_pointer_set(). For some reason I was not
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:29:36 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Reviewed-by: jvos, kcr, arapte
I confirm that this is a clean backport, but Skara failed to detect that it was
clean due to [SKARA-1332](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/SKARA-1332).
-
PR:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:21:39 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Reviewed-by: jvos, kcr, arapte
I confirm that this is a clean backport, but Skara failed to detect that it was
clean due to [SKARA-1332](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/SKARA-1332).
-
PR:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:24:53 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Reviewed-by: jvos, kcr, arapte
I confirm that this is a clean backport, but Skara failed to detect that it was
clean due to [SKARA-1332](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/SKARA-1332).
-
PR:
+1
On 4/20/2022 5:59 AM, Johan Vos wrote:
Hi Kevin,
I request permission to backport the following issue to JavaFX
11.0.16, JavaFX 17.0.4 and JavaFX 18.0.2
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8283328
Apart from whitespace warnings, the patch applies clean
- Johan
1 - 100 of 4743 matches
Mail list logo
