Iv'e done some house cleaning and linked whatever I found. Should have
caused a decent amount of notification spam...
- Nir
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:10 PM, Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> I don't have a strong preference. The URL contains either "issue" or
> "pull"
I don't have a strong preference. The URL contains either "issue" or
"pull" already, so there should be no confusion if we just use the URL.
-- Kevin
Nir Lisker wrote:
github-bug is fine by me. What about external links, name them or
leave them as URLs?
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 16:43 Johan Vos
github-bug is fine by me. What about external links, name them or leave
them as URLs?
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 16:43 Johan Vos wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:30 PM Kevin Rushforth
> wrote:
>
>> Any further comments on this? If not, then
+1
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:30 PM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> Any further comments on this? If not, then I propose we start using the
> JBS label:
>
> github-bug
>
> To identify JBS issues that are linked to guthub issues and/or PRs
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Nir Lisker
Any further comments on this? If not, then I propose we start using the
JBS label:
github-bug
To identify JBS issues that are linked to guthub issues and/or PRs
-- Kevin
Nir Lisker wrote:
I think that the labels should be succinct, so one label should suffice.
Either github-link or
I think that the labels should be succinct, so one label should suffice.
Either github-link or github-bug are fine for me, the latter because there
is webbug label already. If a PR needs review just use the review-request
existing label.
As for issues and PRs, the issue links section in the JIRA
well could we have 2:
* github-issue
* github-pr
The first one indicates someone is working on it over at github, whereas
the second means there's a PR that needs to be review.
Tom
On 29.03.18 08:42, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As such github references point to either issue or PR, I
Hi,
As such github references point to either issue or PR, I recommend using
the term 'github-link'.
Laurent
Le jeu. 29 mars 2018 à 03:40, Kevin Rushforth
a écrit :
> I think this would be fine. We would want something that didn't conflict
> with anything else and
I think this would be fine. We would want something that didn't conflict
with anything else and wasn't confusing. Possible choices:
github-link
github-bug
gitbug-issue
Any preferences?
-- Kevin
Nir Lisker wrote:
Kevin, can we get a label for this?
- Nir
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:37 PM,
Kevin, can we get a label for this?
- Nir
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Johan Vos wrote:
> Hi Nir,
>
> About 4. (jfx-dev): you're right, I just removed that repository. That was
> just some testing before we did the real thing.
>
> As for the other points: I agree
>
>
Hi Nir,
About 4. (jfx-dev): you're right, I just removed that repository. That was
just some testing before we did the real thing.
As for the other points: I agree
- Johan
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:03 PM Nir Lisker wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A few comments about the mirror and
Hi All,
A few comments about the mirror and JBS:
1. In PRs and issues on GitHub, I strongly suggest that the link to JBS be
included in the top comment. If the JBS issue was created after a
discussion, edit it in.
2. In JBS, I suggest to link to the GitHub mirror via More > Link > Web
Link and
12 matches
Mail list logo