On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 01:45:14 GMT, Martin Fox wrote:
> Restored some behavior in genVSproperties that enabled ARM builds and
> cross-compilation on Windows. Verified that I can build on ARM but have no
> way of testing other architectures.
Thanks for this.
@tiainen can you review?
Hi,
Here is a quick update about the headless platform support, as developed in
the jfx-sandbox repo [1].
While there is a Robot implementation in the headless platform
(com.sun.glass.ui.headless), there are still many test failures because we
don't read the pixels (yet).
When running the systemte
On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:03:45 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This PR fixes a hang on exit which can happen if QuantumToolkit.dispose hangs
> when called from the QuantumToolkit shutdown hook. A shutdown hook should
> never run indefinitely, so the fix is to call dispose from a background
> threa
On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:03:45 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This PR fixes a hang on exit which can happen if QuantumToolkit.dispose hangs
> when called from the QuantumToolkit shutdown hook. A shutdown hook should
> never run indefinitely, so the fix is to call dispose from a background
> threa
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:43:14 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Backport the JavaFX 23 release notes to the `jfx23` branch. Note that we will
> _not_ trigger a respin of JavaFX 23 as a result of this.
Marked as reviewed by jvos (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:19:40 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit 33d82c04 from the openjdk/jfx
> repository.
>
> The commit being backported was authored by Jay Bhaskar on 21 Jul 2024 and
> was reviewed by Kevin Rushfort
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:23:42 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit 33d82c04 from the openjdk/jfx
> repository.
>
> The commit being backported was authored by Jay Bhaskar on 21 Jul 2024 and
> was reviewed by Kevin Rushfort
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit 33d82c04 from the openjdk/jfx
repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Jay Bhaskar on 21 Jul 2024 and was
reviewed by Kevin Rushforth.
Thanks!
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 33d82c04dd8c4c3fa9188da5c263e0f406a
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit 33d82c04 from the openjdk/jfx
repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Jay Bhaskar on 21 Jul 2024 and was
reviewed by Kevin Rushforth.
Thanks!
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 33d82c04dd8c4c3fa9188da5c263e0f406a
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 10:06:27 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit 34bbf853 from the openjdk/jfx
> repository.
>
> The commit being backported was authored by Hima Bindu Meda on 16 Jul 2024
> and was reviewed by Kevin Rushf
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:57:50 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [34bbf853](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/34bbf85362fae946c6306eb52a8478aa2ca3ef5f)
> from the [openjdk/jfx](https://git.openjdk.org/jfx) repository.
>
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit 34bbf853 from the openjdk/jfx
repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Hima Bindu Meda on 16 Jul 2024 and
was reviewed by Kevin Rushforth and Joeri Sykora.
Thanks!
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 34bbf85362fae9
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit
[34bbf853](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/34bbf85362fae946c6306eb52a8478aa2ca3ef5f)
from the [openjdk/jfx](https://git.openjdk.org/jfx) repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Hima Bindu Meda on 16 Jul 2024 and
was
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 13:39:11 GMT, Sergey Chernyshev
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please review a clean backport of
> [d24e96a6](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/d24e96a66f1908b5a1a1a7d48ee938ba1c782e6c)
> from the [openjdk/jfx](https://git.openjdk.org/jfx) repository.
>
> The fix being backport
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 12:36:42 GMT, Sergey Chernyshev
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please review the clean backport of the commit
> [ca04c87d](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/ca04c87d307c36591162af8cd6298ede17812834)
> from the [openjdk/jfx](https://git.openjdk.org/jfx) repository.
>
> The commi
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:01:03 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Bump version number to 23.0.2
Marked as reviewed by jvos (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx23u/pull/20#pullrequestreview-2293139860
On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 22:43:11 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> > Old version of classes `netscape.javascript.JSObject` and
> > `netscape.javascript.JSException` seems to be delivered with JavaFX for
> > Android [1].
> > Should these classes be removed?
> > [1] :
> > https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/t
On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 22:56:37 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Add the `jdk.jsobject` module to JavaFX. This module is currently delivered
>> by the JDK, but will be terminally-deprecated in JDK 24 by
>> [JDK-8311530](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8311530), which is out for
>> review at ope
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the extensive checks on these scenario's. I believe the scenario
where jlink is used with an "old" JDK (e.g. 21) in combination with the
most recent JavaFX release is very common. In that case, it seems to be
required to prepend the module path with $JAVA_HOME/jmods, correct?
On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 07:20:50 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> When building webkit, the perl script in
> `modules/javafx.web/src/main/native/Tools/Scripts/build-webkit` will check
> for a `-j` argument in `$makeArgs`. If that doesn't exist, it will default to
> `numberOfCPUs()`.
>
build.gradle` to the
> `build-webkit` script. When not setting `NUM_COMPILE_THREADS` explicitly,it
> will default to the number of CPU's as well, hence it will have the same
> behavior as without this PR.
> When setting `NUM_COMPILE_THREADS` explicitly, the provided number will be
&g
On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 17:46:17 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Btw, I ran another CI build with the `NUM_COMPILE_THREADS=1` workaround for
> Mac removed, and the build times are good again. In fact, the x64 build runs
> even faster than before -- possibly because WebKit build defaults to a lower
>
On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 17:27:15 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Presuming that my testing shows no problems, I propose the following:
>
> 1. I will close [JDK-8089417](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8089417) as
> "Cannot reproduce"
> 2. I will file a new bug to remove the workaround that current
On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 07:20:50 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> When building webkit, the perl script in
> `modules/javafx.web/src/main/native/Tools/Scripts/build-webkit` will check
> for a `-j` argument in `$makeArgs`. If that doesn't exist, it will default to
> `numberOfCPUs()`.
>
On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 07:20:50 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> When building webkit, the perl script in
> `modules/javafx.web/src/main/native/Tools/Scripts/build-webkit` will check
> for a `-j` argument in `$makeArgs`. If that doesn't exist, it will default to
> `numberOfCPUs()`.
>
ore it succeeds (on Linux).
> And I used an old Ryzen 7 1700X with 16 threads, 16GB. I have now upgraded
> it, but I haven't built webkit yet. I'm really scared of it :)
>
> So limiting the threads seems like a good idea.
>
>
> Em qua., 24 de abr. de 2024 às 04:
When building webkit, the perl script in
`modules/javafx.web/src/main/native/Tools/Scripts/build-webkit` will check for
a `-j` argument in `$makeArgs`. If that doesn't exist, it will default to
`numberOfCPUs()`.
This PR passes the `NUM_COMPILE_THREADS` from `build.gradle` to the
`build-webkit`
On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 11:49:58 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
> This PR adds the required annotations to the iOS sources in the JavaFX Web
> module, to allow the compilation of such sources, now that `-Werror` is
> enabled, in the same way that was done for
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-82
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 20:46:00 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit 25ac6fed from the openjdk/jfx
> repository.
>
> The commit being backported was authored by Johan Vos on 25 Jul 2024 and was
> reviewed by John Hendrikx, Am
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 20:36:48 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [1bdb93c7](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/1bdb93c792cf7c218c74ec5cacda8bac1242f73b)
> from the [openjdk/jfx](https://git.openjdk.org/jfx) repository.
>
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 20:37:23 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit 101e5175 from the openjdk/jfx
> repository.
>
> The commit being backported was authored by Kevin Rushforth on 25 Jun 2024
> and was reviewed by Ambaris
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 20:46:48 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit 101e5175 from the openjdk/jfx
> repository.
>
> The commit being backported was authored by Kevin Rushforth on 25 Jun 2024
> and was reviewed by Ambaris
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit 101e5175 from the openjdk/jfx
repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Kevin Rushforth on 25 Jun 2024 and
was reviewed by Ambarish Rapte and Phil Race.
Thanks!
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 101e5175ff429828de
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit 25ac6fed from the openjdk/jfx
repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Johan Vos on 25 Jul 2024 and was
reviewed by John Hendrikx, Ambarish Rapte and Jose Pereda.
Thanks!
-
Commit messages:
- Backport
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit 101e5175 from the openjdk/jfx
repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Kevin Rushforth on 25 Jun 2024 and
was reviewed by Ambarish Rapte and Phil Race.
Thanks!
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 101e5175ff429828de
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit
[1bdb93c7](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/1bdb93c792cf7c218c74ec5cacda8bac1242f73b)
from the [openjdk/jfx](https://git.openjdk.org/jfx) repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Jose Pereda on 25 Jul 2024 and was
revi
> Is there any progress update on this? It appears (I may be wrong) to be a
> low risk addition to JavaFX, but with significant benefits, particularly as
> Monocle is no longer part of JavaFX builds.
>
> Thanks,
> Craig
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:49 PM Johan Vos wrote:
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 13:08:26 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> 8329011: Update SQLite to 3.45.3
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: eb330d88
Author: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/commit/eb330d883d32b9cc1f9d0c894b01b160b2bfe2c3
Stats: 26451 lines in 4 fi
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 13:04:30 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> 8329011: Update SQLite to 3.45.3
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 454ac50c
Author: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/commit/454ac50cea8f93f5c8bd7c30393d0ca2648b245f
Stats: 26451 lines in 4 fi
8329011: Update SQLite to 3.45.3
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 581e3a70a45a550a97e391e06735f4837336ada8
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/pull/197/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx17u&pr=197&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329011
St
8329011: Update SQLite to 3.45.3
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 581e3a70a45a550a97e391e06735f4837336ada8
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/67/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx21u&pr=67&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329011
Stat
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 10:04:12 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> almost clean backport of 8319779: SystemMenu: memory leak due to listener
> never being removed
> Didn't apply clean because the imports where shuffled.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: ef8397aa
Author:
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 08:47:38 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Almost clean backport of JDK-8334874: Horizontal scroll events from touch
> pads should scroll the TabPane tabs
> The only change was the (c) date that had changed.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 29aa85
almost clean backport of 8319779: SystemMenu: memory leak due to listener never
being removed
Didn't apply clean because the imports where shuffled.
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 25ac6fed22d0f49d01c831aaa48049c34899fe96
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/66/files
Webrev
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 08:41:59 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Backport of 8323787: Mac System MenuBar throws IOB exception
>
> Required manual changes as the location of the test has changed.
This pull request has been closed without being integrated.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.o
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 08:41:59 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Backport of 8323787: Mac System MenuBar throws IOB exception
>
> Required manual changes as the location of the test has changed.
closed in favor of #66
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/63#iss
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 09:23:42 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> 8318841: macOS: Memory leak with MenuItem when Menu.useSystemMenuBar(true) is
> used
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: e6f725f5
Author: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/
8318841: macOS: Memory leak with MenuItem when Menu.useSystemMenuBar(true) is
used
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 8dd3c37cae3dd52dc3a258033d0e8f168ceaf307
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/65/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx21u&pr=65&range=00
Issue:
Almost clean backport of JDK-8334874: Horizontal scroll events from touch pads
should scroll the TabPane tabs
The only change was the (c) date that had changed.
-
Commit messages:
- 8334874: Horizontal scroll events from touch pads should scroll the TabPane
tabs
Changes: https://g
Backport of 8323787: Mac System MenuBar throws IOB exception
Required manual changes as the location of the test has changed.
-
Commit messages:
- 8319779: SystemMenu: memory leak due to listener never being removed
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/63/files
Webrev: h
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 23:00:33 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> This PR fixes a bad assumption in a few places in `build.gradle`, which
>> assumes that the module name can be derived from the name of the gradle
>> project name by prepending `"javafx."` to the name rather than using the
>> `moduleN
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 10:34:08 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> A listener was added but never removed.
> This patch removes the listener when the menu it links to is cleared. Fix for
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319779
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 25ac6f
On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 08:34:10 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Start work on 21.0.5
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: c1ddcf8b
Author: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/commit/c1ddcf8ba5ae3c81366ad7935e45450177b9ba9d
Stats: 2 lines in 2 files changed: 0
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:21:54 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a clean backport of commit
> [a118d333](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/a118d33314a363336134d31c45b50329594e5a24)
> from the [openjdk/jfx](https://git.openjdk.org/jfx) repository.
>
> The commit
On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 08:31:42 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Start work on 17.0.13
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: e2b18b1d
Author: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/commit/e2b18b1d30074406cca1541c195d8cb369d18935
Stats: 2 lines in 2 files changed
On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:41:27 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This is a copy of the jfx22u README and CONTRIBUTING docs, changing 22 to 23,
> with one additional change to add the word "Updates" after "23" in one place
> where it was missing (the current wording could mislead developers into
> th
Start work on 21.0.5
-
Commit messages:
- Start work on 21.0.5
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/62/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx21u&pr=62&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8336733
Stats: 2 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 d
On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 08:34:10 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Start work on 21.0.5
start work on 21.0.5
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/62#issuecomment-2235947269
Start work on 17.0.13
-
Commit messages:
- Start work on 17.0.13
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/pull/196/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx17u&pr=196&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8336730
Stats: 2 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins;
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 22:56:18 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Updates for the beginning of the 23.0.1 release.
Marked as reviewed by jvos (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx23u/pull/1#pullrequestreview-2184887758
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 11:18:34 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean merge of July CPU content into `jfx22u:master`. Note that this is a
> no-op merge, since there is no security content for this release. The only
> content is some identity merge commits. There are no changes to the contents
> of
On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 18:44:15 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Release notes for JavaFX 22.0.2.
>
> Notes to reviewers:
>
> I used the following filter to pick the issues:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/issues/?filter=45846
>
> The original filter, with the backport IDs, is here:
>
> https://bugs.
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 14:50:08 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> tests/system/src/test/java/test/com/sun/javafx/tk/quantum/SystemMenuBarTest.java
>> line 321:
>>
>>> 319: Stage stage = new Stage();
>>> 320: stage.setScene(new Scene(root));
>>> 321: stage.show();
>>
Thanks all for commenting.
What I have read so far seems that there is an agreement for this approach:
* don't prefix tests with `test` anymore
* use a (somehow) descriptive name
* add a comment that refers to the JBS issue that this test is dealing with
* (optional) in case the test or test scenar
Hi,
An interesting question from John Hendrikx (
https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/1283/#discussion_r1637684395) probably
needs some general discussion on this list.
Afaik, we don't have guidelines for how to name tests (in
https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#coding-style-
On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 22:51:47 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Bump the version number of JavaFX to 24. I will integrate this to `master` as
> part of forking the `jfx23` stabilization branch, which is scheduled for
> Thursday, July 11, 2024 at 16:00 UTC.
Marked as reviewed by jvos (Reviewer).
---
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:25:52 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> Johan Vos has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - process more reviewer comments
>> - Process reviewer comments
>
> tests/system/
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:39:11 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> Johan Vos has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - process more reviewer comments
>> - Process reviewer comments
>
> tests/system/
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 07:17:01 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> Johan Vos has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add more type info
>
> tests/system/src/test/java/test/com/sun/javafx/tk/quantum/Syst
> A listener was added but never removed.
> This patch removes the listener when the menu it links to is cleared. Fix for
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319779
Johan Vos has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Allow
> A listener was added but never removed.
> This patch removes the listener when the menu it links to is cleared. Fix for
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319779
Johan Vos has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional
commits since the last revision:
- Ad
> A listener was added but never removed.
> This patch removes the listener when the menu it links to is cleared. Fix for
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319779
Johan Vos has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
a rebase. The pull request now co
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 07:49:26 GMT, Alexander Zvegintsev
wrote:
>> Most of the headful test failures on XWayland are due to screen capture is
>> not working.
>>
>> Wayland, unlike X11, does not allow arbitrary applications to capture the
>> screen contents directly.
>> Instead, screen capture f
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 18:26:20 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/native-glass/gtk/fp_pipewire.h line 26:
>>
>>> 24: */
>>> 25:
>>> 26: #ifdef HEADLESS
>>
>> There is no HEADLESS build for JavaFX. I see the same ifdef in other C
>> files in this PR.
>> I guess its
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:23:30 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> 8329705: Add missing Application thread checks to platform specific a11y
> methods
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: b90f009d
Author: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:23:53 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> 8329705: Add missing Application thread checks to platform specific a11y
> methods
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: a205815f
Author: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/
8329705: Add missing Application thread checks to platform specific a11y methods
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 0eb4d7196099d817cc6467985b882242845bdd2e
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/61/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx21u&pr=61&range=00
Issue: ht
8329705: Add missing Application thread checks to platform specific a11y methods
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 0eb4d7196099d817cc6467985b882242845bdd2e
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/pull/194/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx17u&pr=194&range=00
Issue:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 13:47:54 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> 8301312: Create implementation of NSAccessibilityButton protocol
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: cf66048e
Author: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/commit/cf66048eb7519a2c652ccf388218c385e8820
8301312: Create implementation of NSAccessibilityButton protocol
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 05548ace27f099a5ce152e3fb9efb4d22da683c8
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/pull/193/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx17u&pr=193&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.ope
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:25:15 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
>> Johan Vos has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add more type info
>
> modules/javafx.graphics/src/shims/java/com/sun/javafx/tk/quantum/Gl
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 07:05:49 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> Johan Vos has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> process reviewers comments
>
> Looks all good to me.
> Is it possible to add an auto
> A listener was added but never removed.
> This patch removes the listener when the menu it links to is cleared. Fix for
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319779
Johan Vos has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- pro
> A listener was added but never removed.
> This patch removes the listener when the menu it links to is cleared. Fix for
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319779
Johan Vos has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
a rebase. The pull request now co
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:20:12 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
>> Johan Vos has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> process reviewers comments
>
> About adding an automated test, the leak t
Hi Christopher,
The question about Windows. AArch64 increasingly pops up. We did some local
tests, and the basis modules builds out-of-the-box, but media and web
modules require more work.
It's definitely helpful that there are GA runners for it now -- although
the GA is just a basic check.
It wou
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 17:39:04 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> 8332539: Update libxml2 to 2.12.7
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 1d2bc14d
Author: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/commit/1d2bc14df14d09a921194b273249e394fb1012ff
Stats: 67 lines in 9 fi
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 17:39:07 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> 8332539: Update libxml2 to 2.12.7
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 14575c54
Author: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/commit/14575c54a2b665384bbf4d81a1e2672912691562
Stats: 67 lines in 9 fi
8332539: Update libxml2 to 2.12.7
-
Commit messages:
- Backport dedcf1d236b5429dcf3c42f5fd1095b28d5da063
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/60/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx21u&pr=60&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8332539
Sta
8332539: Update libxml2 to 2.12.7
-
Commit messages:
- Backport dedcf1d236b5429dcf3c42f5fd1095b28d5da063
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/pull/192/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx17u&pr=192&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8332539
S
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:18:04 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> 8331748: Update libxml2 to 2.12.6
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 1dfcbed2
Author: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/commit/1dfcbed2f5586c3efceed4c95ebec3d23ee99573
Stats: 24912 lines in
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:19:52 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> 8331748: Update libxml2 to 2.12.6
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: f8e75ca6
Author: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/commit/f8e75ca6b9fc2005285f76fe958c589cb9a328c3
Stats: 24912 lines in
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:36:16 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> 8332328: [GHA] GitHub Actions build fails on Linux: unable to find gcc-13
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 3a7cad84
Author: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/com
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:35:28 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> 8332328: [GHA] GitHub Actions build fails on Linux: unable to find gcc-13
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 20866584
Author: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/com
8331748: Update libxml2 to 2.12.6
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 97b1402501983f121f75c24a510f466837fa2ecc
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/pull/190/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx17u&pr=190&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8331748
S
8332328: [GHA] GitHub Actions build fails on Linux: unable to find gcc-13
-
Commit messages:
- Backport d7ab55184f757a614f9fc8f191c3c5794a16cc88
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/pull/191/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx17u&pr=191&range=00
Issue: https:/
8332328: [GHA] GitHub Actions build fails on Linux: unable to find gcc-13
-
Commit messages:
- Backport d7ab55184f757a614f9fc8f191c3c5794a16cc88
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/59/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx21u&pr=59&range=00
Issue: https://b
8331748: Update libxml2 to 2.12.6
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 97b1402501983f121f75c24a510f466837fa2ecc
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/58/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx21u&pr=58&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8331748
Sta
Yes, that is why I filed https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333147
(which hints at a fix:
Instead of `classifier "$t.name"` we should now use `archiveClassifier.set(
t.name)`
)
- Johan
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 4:58 PM John Neffenger wrote:
> On 5/29/24 12:19 AM, Joeri Sykora wrote:
> > maven a
On Wed, 22 May 2024 15:50:46 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> As seen in the unit test of the PR, when we click on the area above/below
>> the scrollbar the position jumps - but the jump is now not always consistent.
>> In the current version on the last cell - the UI always jumps to the top. In
1 - 100 of 645 matches
Mail list logo
