On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:34:19 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Backport fix to substitute openjdk.java.net with openjdk.org. Most of the
> patch applied cleanly, but there were a few files modified in mainline that
> don't exist in jfx17u (so excluded from backport). Additionally, I had to
> manua
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:34:19 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Backport fix to substitute openjdk.java.net with openjdk.org. Most of the
> patch applied cleanly, but there were a few files modified in mainline that
> don't exist in jfx17u (so excluded from backport). Additionally, I had to
> manua
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:34:19 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Backport fix to substitute openjdk.java.net with openjdk.org. Most of the
> patch applied cleanly, but there were a few files modified in mainline that
> don't exist in jfx17u (so excluded from backport). Additionally, I had to
> manua
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:34:19 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Backport fix to substitute openjdk.java.net with openjdk.org. Most of the
> patch applied cleanly, but there were a few files modified in mainline that
> don't exist in jfx17u (so excluded from backport). Additionally, I had to
> manua
Backport fix to substitute openjdk.java.net with openjdk.org. Most of the patch
applied cleanly, but there were a few files modified in mainline that don't
exist in jfx17u (so excluded from backport). Additionally, I had to manually
update the following:
CONTRIBUTING.md
README.md
doc-files/rel
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:34:19 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Backport fix to substitute openjdk.java.net with openjdk.org. Most of the
> patch applied cleanly, but there were a few files modified in mainline that
> don't exist in jfx17u (so excluded from backport). Additionally, I had to
> manua
