> as determined by SkinMemoryLeakTest (remove line 180) and a leak tester
> https://github.com/andy-goryachev-oracle/Test/blob/main/src/goryachev/apps/LeakTest.java
> 
> caused by:
> - adding and not removing listeners
> - adding and not removing event handlers/filters
> - adding and not removing cell factory
> - holding unnecessary instance in TreeTableViewSkin.treeTableViewSkin // 
> test-only
> 
> NOTES:
> 1. this fix requires JDK-8294809 ListenerHelper and JDK-8295806 TableViewSkin.
> 2. there were more memory leaks in this skin than detected by 
> SkinMemoryLeakTest, probably because of cell factory (?).  A manual test 
> using LeakTest shows that there are no memory leaks after a) replacing skin, 
> b) moving the components to a new window, and c) removing all the components 
> from the window.

Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 37 commits:

 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into
   8295809.tree.table.view.skin
 - 8295809: cleanup
 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into
   8295809.tree.table.view.skin
 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 
8295809.tree.table.view.skin
 - Merge branch '8295806.table.view.skin' into 8295809.tree.table.view.skin
 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into
   8295806.table.view.skin
 - Merge branch '8295806.table.view.skin' into 8295809.tree.table.view.skin
 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into
   8295806.table.view.skin
 - 8295809: cleanup
 - Merge branch '8295806.table.view.skin' into 8295809.tree.table.view.skin
 - ... and 27 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/compare/07e693b5...4f40923a

-------------

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/931/files
 Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx&pr=931&range=02
  Stats: 197 lines in 4 files changed: 93 ins; 77 del; 27 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/931.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx pull/931/head:pull/931

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/931

Reply via email to