> Note: I ran into a `javac` compiler bug while replacing types with diamond 
> operators (ecj has no issues).  I had two options, add a 
> `SuppressWarnings("unused")` or to use a lambda instead of a method reference 
> to make `javac` happy.  I choose the later and added a comment so it can be 
> fixed once the bug is fixed.  I've reported the issue here: 
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8297428
> 
> - Remove unsupported/unnecessary SuppressWarning annotations
> - Remove reduntant type specifications (use diamond operator)
> - Remove unused or duplicate imports
> - Remove unnecessary casts (type is already correct type or can be autoboxed)
> - Remove unnecessary semi-colons (at end of class definitions, or just 
> repeated ones)
> - Remove redundant super interfaces (interface that is already inherited)
> - Remove unused type parameters
> - Remove declared checked exceptions that are never thrown
> - Add missing `@Override` annotations

John Hendrikx has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional 
commits since the last revision:

 - Revert read only property instanceof checks
   
   Added SuppressWarnings("cast") as these checks should be retained
 - Replace StubToolkit casts with asserts

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/959/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/959/files/1341a438..76acacb8

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx&pr=959&range=04
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx&pr=959&range=03-04

  Stats: 151 lines in 23 files changed: 100 ins; 25 del; 26 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/959.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx pull/959/head:pull/959

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/959

Reply via email to