Tests OK Solaris 9 sparcv7/sparcv9.
> Please test RE23. It has been tagged for 2.3.43, and considered ready for
> release unless something showstopping is reported. Latest change was to
> fix ppolicy (ITS#5569).
Fedora i386 ok. more later.
--
Kind Regards,
Gavin Henry.
Managing Director.
T +44 (0) 1224 279484
M +44 (0) 7930
On Jul 12, 2008, at 06:42 , Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Please test RE23. It has been tagged for 2.3.43, and considered
ready for release unless something showstopping is reported. Latest
change was to fix ppolicy (ITS#5569).
All OK on Mac OS X 10.5.4/Intel
jens
On Monday 07 July 2008 19:01:40 Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> Please test RE23, thanks!
>
> Only minor fixes plus the security fix.
I think ITS #5569 is minor enough but useful enough to be included ... (aka, I
need it, I'll be including it in all my builds, as I have since
http://svn.mandriva.co
--On Friday, July 11, 2008 5:02 PM +0200 Buchan Milne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 07 July 2008 19:01:40 Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Please test RE23, thanks!
Only minor fixes plus the security fix.
I think ITS #5569 is minor enough but useful enough to be included ...
(aka, I need
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Please test RE23, thanks!
Tests OK Solaris 9 sparcv7/sparcv9.
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Please test RE23, thanks!
Only minor fixes plus the security fix.
FWIW it passed all tests on openSUSE 10.3 i586.
Ciao, Michael.
On Jul 7, 2008, at 19:01 , Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Please test RE23, thanks!
Tests run fine on OS X 10.5.4/Intel.
jens
Fine on Fedora i386/x86_64/ and the same on Ubuntu and Debian Etch (same archs).
--
http://www.suretecsystems.com/services/openldap/
Donn Cave wrote:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 2:32 AM, Howard Chu wrote:
Donn Cave wrote:
On NetBSD 3.1, test008-concurrency dies trying to allocate
8388608 bytes -
search_candidates: base="dc=example,dc=com" (0x0001) scope=2
ch_malloc of 8388608 bytes failed
assertion "0" failed
On Feb 14, 2008, at 2:32 AM, Howard Chu wrote:
Donn Cave wrote:
On NetBSD 3.1, test008-concurrency dies trying to allocate
8388608 bytes -
search_candidates: base="dc=example,dc=com" (0x0001) scope=2
ch_malloc of 8388608 bytes failed
assertion "0" failed: file "ch_malloc.c"
I still have temporary access to a Solaris 10 T5120. I'll give it a whirl.
Thanks for doing this. My usual test machine is temporarily unavailable,
so I'll probably miss this round...
Buchan Milne wrote:
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 19:43:28 Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Are there some non-Linux folks here who can test it? :-)
I consider myself a Linux person, but I do have a Solaris 10 / sparc64 box
under my desk, if no-one else is testing Solaris 10 / sparc, I can go through
Donn Cave wrote:
On NetBSD 3.1, test008-concurrency dies trying to allocate
8388608 bytes -
search_candidates: base="dc=example,dc=com" (0x0001) scope=2
ch_malloc of 8388608 bytes failed
assertion "0" failed: file "ch_malloc.c", line 57, function
"ch_malloc"
Also, same fail
Buchan Milne wrote:
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 19:43:28 Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Are there some non-Linux folks here who can test it? :-)
I consider myself a Linux person, but I do have a Solaris 10 / sparc64 box
under my desk, if no-one else is testing Solaris 10 / sparc, I can go through
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 19:43:28 Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
> Are there some non-Linux folks here who can test it? :-)
I consider myself a Linux person, but I do have a Solaris 10 / sparc64 box
under my desk, if no-one else is testing Solaris 10 / sparc, I can go through
the pain of getting
On NetBSD 3.1, test008-concurrency dies trying to allocate
8388608 bytes -
search_candidates: base="dc=example,dc=com" (0x0001) scope=2
ch_malloc of 8388608 bytes failed
assertion "0" failed: file "ch_malloc.c", line 57, function
"ch_malloc"
#0 0xbd9980fb in kill () from /us
Passes all tests on CentOS4.6 and CentOS5.1 (i686 and virtual machines)
Ing. Luca Scamoni
Responsabile Ricerca e Sviluppo
SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
---
Office: +39 0382 573859 (137)
Mobile: +39 347 1014425
Email:
Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Michael Ströder writes:
Might that be caused by the missing "make depend" step?
If so make distclean (which he did use) would be broken.
There are hosts which don't provide a way to do "make depend".
Any hint? Maybe something related to libtool?
Remove your CPPFL
Michael Ströder writes:
> > Might that be caused by the missing "make depend" step?
If so make distclean (which he did use) would be broken.
There are hosts which don't provide a way to do "make depend".
> Any hint? Maybe something related to libtool?
Remove your CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS. It's the
--On February 12, 2008 12:18:38 PM -0800 Donn Cave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Are there some non-Linux folks here who can test it? :-)
I was going to say "Sure!" since I have a NetBSD host handy
Thanks! Please make sure you sync
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> Please test RE23 in preparation for OpenLDAP 2.3.41.
All regression tests passed on FreeBSD/amd64 7.0-RC2 with
OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_3 tree as of Feb 12, 2008 11:00 PST.
Cheers,
- --
Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ww
On Feb 12, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Are there some non-Linux folks here who can test it? :-)
I was going to say "Sure!" since I have a NetBSD host handy
that I use for LDAP experiments among other things, but
it seems that I can't make test002-populate work, for any
releas
Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
On Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008, Michael Ströder wrote:
Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Michael Ströder writes:
/home/michael/src/openldap/OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_3/openldap/servers/s
lapd/.libs/lt-slapd:
Symbol `ldap_int_global_options' has different size in shared
object, consider
Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Are there some non-Linux folks here who can test it? :-)
The Project's new build server is running, so we may be able to test x86
Solaris or FreeBSD soon.
--
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sunhttp://
On Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
> > Michael Ströder writes:
> >> /home/michael/src/openldap/OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_3/openldap/servers/s
> >>lapd/.libs/lt-slapd:
> >
> > Symbol `ldap_int_global_options' has different size in shared
> > object, consider
Are there some non-Linux folks here who can test it? :-)
--
Hallvard
On Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> Please test RE23 in preparation for OpenLDAP 2.3.41.
All tests passed on opensuse 10.3 x86_64
--
Ralf
Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Michael Ströder writes:
/home/michael/src/openldap/OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_3/openldap/servers/slapd/.libs/lt-slapd:
Symbol `ldap_int_global_options' has different size in shared object, consider
re-linking
What ./configure options? Does make distclean and rebuild help?
> Please test RE23 in preparation for OpenLDAP 2.3.41.
All passes now on i686/x86_64 Fedora 8
> Thanks,
> Quanah+
>
> --
>
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Principal Software Engineer
> Zimbra, Inc
>
> Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
>
Michael Ströder writes:
> /home/michael/src/openldap/OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_3/openldap/servers/slapd/.libs/lt-slapd:
Symbol `ldap_int_global_options' has different size in shared object, consider
re-linking
What ./configure options? Does make distclean and rebuild help?
--
Hallvard
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Please test RE23 in preparation for OpenLDAP 2.3.41.
Does not work for me on openSuSE 10.3.
Starting test000-rootdse ...
running defines.sh
Starting slapd on TCP/IP port 9011...
Using ldapsearch to retrieve the root DSE...
Waiting 5 seconds for slapd to start...
Wa
> Please test RE23 in preparation for OpenLDAP 2.3.41.
Passes for me on Fedora 8, i686, bdb 4.2.52.
Thanks.
RE23 tested successfully solaris sparcv9/sparcv7, bdb 4.2. Thanks.
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Howard Chu wrote:
Now that 2.4.7 is released, please take a look at RE23. This should probably
be the last 2.3 release. Thanks.
--
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Directo
34 matches
Mail list logo
