Re: new slapd.d configuration format and Invalid DN syntax (34)

2005-08-27 Thread Howard Chu
Ah, you still have defaultSearchBase in cn=config, and it is preventing the rest of the config from being built correctly. I thought I had removed this from cn=config when I moved the attribute to the Frontend object, but apparently it's also still present in the cn=config entry. We'll fix

Re: new slapd.d configuration format and Invalid DN syntax (34)

2005-08-27 Thread Howard Chu
This is fixed in CVS slapd/bconfig.c, latest revision in HEAD and OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_3. Samuel Tran wrote: Here is the full output: sudo /usr/local/libexec/slapd -d 255 -u ldap -F /etc/openldap/slapd.d -4 [?1h=@(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.3.6 (Aug 24 2005 12:46:47) $ [EMAIL

are simple binds deprecated?

2005-08-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
/usr/include/ldap.h (OL-2.3.6): #if LDAP_DEPRECATED /* * in bind.c: * (deprecated) */ LDAP_F( int ) ldap_bind LDAP_P(( /* deprecated */

Re: are simple binds deprecated?

2005-08-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Em Sábado 27 Agosto 2005 12:39, Kurt D. Zeilenga escreveu: The quoted material implies this particular interface is deprecated. It says nothing about LDAP simple bind itself. What is the non-deprecated way of unbinding? ldap_unbind(3) is marked as deprecated in /usr/include/ldap.h from

Re: are simple binds deprecated?

2005-08-27 Thread Kurt D. Zeilenga
At 09:17 AM 8/27/2005, Andreas Hasenack wrote: Em Sábado 27 Agosto 2005 12:39, Kurt D. Zeilenga escreveu: The quoted material implies this particular interface is deprecated. It says nothing about LDAP simple bind itself. What is the non-deprecated way of unbinding? ldap_unbind_ext(3).

Re: how can I write to a slave?

2005-08-27 Thread Pierangelo Masarati
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: so, with 2.2.x OpenLDAP series, it's impossible? OL2.2 does not support global overlays. updateref is returned __before__ the database's write operation is invoked, so stacking the chain overlay on a database does not work. p. SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100

threads v. concurrency?

2005-08-27 Thread Ben Beuchler
While threads seems pretty clearly to be the hard limit on the maximum number of slapd threads that will be spawned, how does concurrency relate? Any good rules-of-thumb for how it should be set? Thanks! -Ben

Re: threads v. concurrency?

2005-08-27 Thread Howard Chu
Ben Beuchler wrote: While threads seems pretty clearly to be the hard limit on the maximum number of slapd threads that will be spawned, how does concurrency relate? Any good rules-of-thumb for how it should be set? concurrency is relevant on systems with M:N threads implementations, and