François Beretti wrote:
>
> I don't know if it has something to do with the initial question, but
> sometimes I want to make a search such as:
> filter:
> (|(dn=uid=user1,ou=users,dc=domain)(dn=uid=user2,ou=users,dc=domain)(dn=uid=user3,ou=users,dc=domain))
>
> attributes: some attribute
How abo
Thank you very much (for your answer, and to the devs for the implementation)2006/9/27, Kurt D. Zeilenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Modern versions of slapd(8) include an early implementationof draft-zeilenga-ldap-entrydn-xx.txt, a work in progress.At 02:58 PM 9/26/2006, François Beretti wrote:>Hi,>>I do
Hello List,
i have one question :
Is it possible to Setup tow Ldap Servers with the possibility to
synchronize each other instead of replicate from one to the other ?
Like making one change on side A ---> The Server puts this to Side B
automaticly
and makeing changes on Side B ---> get automa
Am 26.09.2006 um 21:15 schrieb Ralf Haferkamp:
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 12:50, Moire wrote:
[..]
Am 20.09.2006 um 19:19 schrieb Darko Delinac:
Limit the search scope to base (-s base) and as a base use the DN,
something like this:
ldapsearch -x -h my_ldap_server -b "cn=Michael
Voss,ou=Eng
I noticed in my ldap, that my uid is unique only in its branch.. is this
correct? how can i fix the configuration to make it unique in the whole tree
?
uid=user1,ou=Mua,ou=People,dc=,dc=net, same uid i can copy to different
branches for example to uid=user1,ou=People,dc=,dc=net
Thnxs in
At 05:43 AM 9/27/2006, TL wrote:
>I noticed in my ldap, that my uid is unique only in its branch.. is this
>correct?
Yes.
>how can i fix the configuration to make it unique in the whole tree ?
Nothing broken, hence nothing to fix.
But you might configure the server to use the unique overlay.
S
At 03:11 AM 9/27/2006, Frank hubrach wrote:
>Hello List,
>i have one question :
>Is it possible to Setup tow Ldap Servers with the possibility to synchronize
>each other instead of replicate from one to the other ?
OpenLDAP Software has included at various times facilities that,
if misused*, woul
